Letters to the Editor for Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large


Published: October 28, 2008

Election Grips Writers’ Attention
McCain no maverick
With so many political ads focusing on the personalities and qualifications of the candidates in the presidential campaign, it is easy to forget that we are not just electing a president and vice president.

Your choice in this presidential election will determine not only who occupies the Oval Office, but also who will be the economic and foreign policy advisers, the White House staff, appointments to Cabinet positions and so on — in short the basic structure of the Executive Branch. In addition, the next president will in all likelihood appoint at least one, and perhaps more, Supreme Court justices who will influence judicial rulings for decades to come.

Letters to the editorClick to send

Despite his claims to be a maverick, it is evident from the way John McCain’s campaign has been run that his advisers are primarily the same folks who brought us the disastrous policies and divisive politics of the last eight years. His campaign has failed to distance itself from the policies of the Bush administration, and has failed to clearly articulate a new vision for the future of the country. McCain’s proposals are essentially an extension of those of the Bush administration. In addition, particularly in the last few weeks of the campaign, we have seen the same kind of poisonous “politics by name calling” that characterized the management of Bush’s campaigns in 2000 and 2004. This exploitation of the culture war was a successful strategy for Bush, but it has led to a toxic political environment that promotes and encourages division along rigid ideological lines.

In his keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention, Barack Obama struck a responsive chord among many Americans who yearn for a more united nation. He asserted that we are not a “Red America” and a “Blue America,” we are the United States of America, and we can work together across ideological boundaries to solve our problems. Obama has backed up that idealistic vision by surrounding himself with advisers of many backgrounds and political persuasions. In the process he has gained the admiration of many Americans, including many Republicans and independents. I am confident that this spirit of collaboration and pragmatism will be continued in the advice and counsel Obama seeks as president and in the numerous appointments he will make.

Who will you vote for Nov. 4?  If you would like to continue politics as usual and continue the partisan divisiveness of the past eight years, then perhaps McCain/Palin is your team.

However, if you want to turn the page on this divisive time and work toward a more united nation that can confidently face our many challenges together, vote for Obama/Biden.
RICHARD D. BARNES
Lynchburg

Good reasons for McCain
I really enjoyed the Oct. 26 editorial endorsement of John McCain in The News & Advance mostly because it eloquently captured the reasons to support a McCain presidency. There is no doubt that McCain supporters embrace these opinions while Obama supporters do not. Still all should agree that it was well written and non-offensive even if you do disagree with the opinions within.

As an American, I am fully prepared to accept an Obama presidency as the latest polling suggests. I just hope all of you voting on the promise of Barack Obama’s tax rebate to 95 percent of America realize the consequences. Raising taxes on corporate America and its wealthy members sounds good on paper, but it has repercussions, which will come in a combination of events. As you heard in the debates, it will hinder job growth and will likely cause the shrinking of the work force. Many companies will convert permanent jobs to temporary positions through agencies. More jobs will go overseas. Companies will also hold off on pay increases and perhaps reduce employee benefits. Plans for expansion and growth will be shelved.  And, the price of the products and services they sell will go up. All of this will be the cause and effect to offset higher taxes.

I know your average voter won’t factor in these consequences. The temptation of a check in the mail and the short-term pleasure it brings is like heroin to a junkie. Just give me a fix and everything will be okay. It doesn’t matter that this particular promise is not good medicine for the country as a whole. In fact, it makes our nation less competitive globally.  The rate of taxation in the United States is the anchor around our neck that is constantly dragging us down and the primary reason jobs continue to go overseas. If elected, Obama would significantly raise the weight of the anchor. Eventually folks, we are going to drown in our corporate tax system.

Vote for less government and fewer taxes, not more, that’s the formula that made this country great.
RICK MALEC
Goode

 

Fearful of Obama’s policies
I hope I am wrong about Barack Obama.
I hope that his economic philosophy to more fairly distribute wealth, that I think is the residue of a discredited social idealism, will usher in a new era of prosperity, rather than economic stagnation and the creation of a burgeoning entitlement class increasingly reliant on the public treasury and whose sole concern in future elections is to vote to themselves more of other people’s money.

I hope that his energy policy, that I think is unreasonably optimistic because of the conspicuous absence of oil, coal and nuclear power, will create real energy independence with abundant and readily available supplies for all our needs, rather than artificially expensive, scarce and heavily rationed energy resources.

I hope that his ideas on improving foreign relations through gestures of goodwill, that I think are dangerously naïve, will result in a new respect for American ideals and influence throughout the world, rather than signal weakness to newly emboldened enemies who will try to exploit perceived opportunities to harm us.

I hope that his vision of a new and principled federal government, that I think is an impossible pipe dream, will create a reinvigorated and dynamic political process, rather than one that disguises the repression of free speech with political correctness, eliminates the free flow of ideas through intimidation, and homogenizes opinion by condemning nonconformity.

I hope that his health plan, that I think is fatally misguided, will result in readily available, quality health care with real choice for all Americans, rather than create a government monopoly for the provision and rationing of health care, overseen by a bloated and expensive bureaucracy unresponsive to and disdainful of the individual needs of the citizen consumer.

I hope that his eloquently expressed desire to uplift the middle class, a desire with which I agree, is the result of real respect for their intelligence and decency and not just hypocritical patronizing to gain the votes of those whom he secretly regards as inferior and as incapable of self determination.

I hope that I am wrong about the man and wrong about the disastrous consequences I foresee if his policies are implemented.

I hope I am wrong, but I do not believe I am. And that is why I am voting for John McCain.
JAMES R. RICHARDS
Lynchburg

 

For Perriello
I attended the town hall meeting that Tom Perriello held the other week in Rustburg. I was very impressed with his range of knowledge concerning the issues confronting our nation at this time. The Fifth District needs a person like Tom Perriello to represent us. We need someone who knows what the problems are and actually has plans to solve them. We need someone who recognizes the interconnectivity of all the issues.

Perriello knows that the Fifth District has the resources to be at the forefront of the energy independence and green jobs movements. Just drilling for more oil is not the answer. He is fully supportive of alternative energies, investigating second-generation bio-fuels and is committed to getting us off our addiction to oil. We are well placed for the opportunity. Just as the Apollo program provided an impetus to create new jobs and new technologies, so will the search for new, green energy technologies.

Perriello was born and raised in the Fifth District. He attended Albemarle County schools. He went out into the world to help right wrongs. However, he has seen first-hand the problems across the globe. He has worked to end atrocities in West African countries. He has experience in Darfur and Afghanistan as a national security analyst.

I urge all the voters in the Fifth District to vote for Tom Perriello on Nov. 4. He is the better candidate and would make a representative that we can be proud of.
SHARON CROCKETT
Lynchburg

 

Endorsement seconded
As a youngster delivered the morning edition of The News & Daily Advance seven days a week for six years in the 1950s; I have subscribed to it ever since with the exception of a extended military leave of absence from Lynchburg during the Vietnam War era.

And I could not be more pleased with your Oct. 26 editorial endorsement of John McCain.

You laid it out from a “True Main Street” perspective about things that really matter, even today in our so-called “high-tech, politically correct, global society of change,” recognizing that “it is the individual American who is responsible for himself, his family, his future … not government.”

With so many important things to think about in this election, it just has to be more than a personality contest or spoken words. Thank you.
HARRIS GARDNER
Bedford

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( TarHeel ) on October 30, 2008 at 8:23 am

Marie, Biden said Obama was not involved with ACORN. Follow Laurie’s argument. That was a lie, but we are growing accustomed to getting lies from the Obama campaign, such as his assertion that he would take public financing and then decided instead to take millions in illegal, undocumented funds.  Try this test: Donate to the Obama campaign with your credit or debit card using a fake name and address.  It will be accepted with no problem. You see, this way he can take donations way over the individual cap.  How do you think he paid for that load of lies last night?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Marie Batten ) on October 30, 2008 at 7:03 am

Laurie…ACORN is in the business of registering ALL potential voters.  It is available to everyone not just lilly white fundamental elitists or the homeless on 5th Street. 

They are obligated, under law, to take all voter registration applications to the Office of the Registrar.  It is then the Registrar’s responsibility to determine eligibility.  Voter cards are mailed to the applicant…if ‘Daffy Duck’ doesnt reside at a residence, then I would bet he/she doesnt get a votercard much less show up at a polling place to vote.

Tell me again exactly what your accusation is!  If it is that Obama, an attorney, represented a client you deem unsavory, then that’s your problem!  If it is that he has shown concern about how minorities are generally represented in our court system, then that’s your biased problem.  We could easily turn the conversation to how the Supreme Court interfered in the 2000 Florida election!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( fire law ) on October 29, 2008 at 9:46 pm

These letters supporting McCain are classics. They should be bound and printed by the new publishing house Liberty just set up to prove that some of these authors have been collectively abducted by aliens, their brains removed, and returned to earth.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Laurie ) on October 29, 2008 at 9:20 pm

Did you hear Biden say their campaign is not involved with Acorn? To claim that Obama not involved with Acorn is a bold faced lie.  Obama sued the state of Illinois on behalf of ACORN over their Motor-Voter law. He also told ACORN during a speech to the group in December 2007, that “before I even get inaugurated, during the transition, we’re going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda.“ In November of last year, he told them… “I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.“ Hmm. Sounds pretty involved with ACORN to me.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( eyeinthesky ) on October 29, 2008 at 8:55 pm

Back in 2000, when McCain ran for President, he really was a maverick. He told the Religious Right where they could stuff their intolerance (which they falsely call Christianity), and he told special interests to take a hike.
But after Bush used lies and inuendo to send him down to defeat, McCain sold his soul to the extremists. That was his first bad decision.
Then, this summer, to appease the extremists again, he allowed them to choose Sarah Palin, the Alaskan albatross, as his running mate. While she has energized some of the extremist base, the rest of the country wonders “Who is this whack job from Alaska?“
McCain is not the leader he once was, and the Republicans don’t deserve four more years.
Vote Obama-Biden. The thought of Sarah Palin anywhere near the White House is a scary thought indeed.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Lifer ) on October 29, 2008 at 5:50 pm

Oh my, how I love reading these posts!  All of you are very entertaining.  I usually skip the news stories and head right to here. (Smile) Some of your jabs have me ROTFLMAO.

I love this country and our wonderful freedom of speech!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Marie Batten ) on October 29, 2008 at 5:20 pm

You cannot write this stuff….PALIN HAS JUST SAID TO CNN THAT IF THIS ELECTION DOESNT WORK OUT SHE IS INTERESTED IN THE 2012 ELECTION….....this has got to be sending the karl rove boys over the moon!

Poor McSame!  Does he ever have a tiger by the proverbial tail….Im loving it!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on October 29, 2008 at 4:57 pm

(coffeeroad)... The term “lifestyle” and the phrase ..“Hated the strangulation of repressive government and taxation of the liberal north.“..  have me really wondering about you.

  “lifestyle” is a buzz phrase.

  “Liberal North” .. “repressive government”(?) (coffeeroad), Do you by any chance refer to your place as “The Compound”?  Got enough ammo do you?

  Hey, it’s a free country and you are free to see it all as whining if it pleases you.  I love a good argument, rarely get one, but once in a while ya hook a fish.  I wasn’t kidding about the anthropology stuff.  For me, this IS a very strange and foreign land.  Nice weather….. but odd.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( JJ Towler ) on October 29, 2008 at 4:10 pm

Sharon Crockett has written an excellent letter in favor of Tom Perriello.  Like her, I attended one of the debates between Good and Perriello.  What a shame Mr. Goode backed out of doing a televised debate so everyone could see how he responds to difficult questions about the economy and world affairs.

Tom Perriello has extensive experience with activities in Virginia and at the international level.  He has a wealth of ideas to benefit, not only the people of the 5th district, but the entire country.  Perhaps that is why Virgil Goode was afraid to face his worthy opponent in televised debates.  Although Goode denied he had ever agreed to a televised debate, I consulted with the news director of the Charlottesville TV station, Channel 29, who wrote, “Mr. Goode’s campaign manager confirmed the debate for us during the first week in September. One week before the debate was supposed to take place, Mr. Goode informed us that he had a conflict with that date (despite having the date in writing since April)…”  Therefore, it appears Goode is not telling the truth about this, or he has no idea what his campaign staff is doing, or BOTH!
In a Letter to the Editor published in the Martinsville Bulletin, on Sunday, October 12, 2008, Mr. Goode wrote “I have done one debate in Charlottesville with the Senior Statesman. I have done one debate with the Sorenson Institute at the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research. I want to do another debate so that we will have three debates, which is the same number being done by the presidential candidates.”
What kind of math is Mr. Goode doing that he suggests his 3 debates before small, localized audiences are EQUAL to 3 televised presidential debates which are available to be seen by millions of people?  The truth is Mr. Goode cowers at a televised debate because the larger audience would surely witness his shrill bigotry and erroneous accusations as were conspicuously evident in the first two debates.  Mr. Goode’s campaign, heavily funded by lobbyists, preys on the fearful and ill-informed, as depicted by Goode’s recent ominous TV ad which portrays his opponent as a terrorist.
Tom Perriello, born and raised in Virginia, accepts no money from lobbyists and, if elected, would truly represent the people of this district.  His platform presents intelligent, honest, articulate proposals which would greatly benefit the 5th District.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement