Letters to the Editor for Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Published: July 21, 2008
Writer: Indict Bush for U.S. war crimes
In 2003, the United States launched an unprovoked war of aggression against Iraq.
After the U.S. occupied Iraq, its troops protected only two places in Baghdad: the Oil Ministry, with its detailed inventory of Iraqi oil reserves, and the Ministry of the Interior, the headquarters of the ousted regime’s secret police. Hospitals, schools, the national museum, the national library, power plants, waste treatment plants, military and research installations, ammunition dumps and the like were all thoroughly looted throughout the country while American soldiers passively looked on or, even in some cases, encouraged the looting. This was well-documented by Agence France-Presse (AFP), World Socialist Web Site at http://www.wsws.org and United for Peace and Justice (Web site: http://www.unitedforpeace.org).
The al-Tuwaitha site (where the 550 metric tons of yellowcake were suddenly “discovered” after sitting there for over 17 years!) was well-known to everybody, from United Nations inspectors to the CIA and the U.S. military, and yet was not protected for several weeks. Iraqi villagers, not knowing any better, stole barrels full of radioactive yellowcake, emptied them and used them to store food and water. Greenpeace went there to retrieve the barrels and other contaminated equipment. But, it was already too late. Iraqis are now dying horrible deaths from radiation poisoning, as documented by ARP and Greenpeace.
Recently the International Criminal Court charged Omar al-Bashir, the president of Sudan, with war crimes and crimes against humanity. An article titled “First al-Bashir, next … Bush?” by Mark Levine, professor of Middle East history at the University of California, Irvine, commented on those charges. Not surprisingly, it was not published by any of the so-called “liberal” media, but by Aljazeera.Net.
That article states, in part: “For Americans, however, the ICC indictment should offer a moment of somber reflection not merely for our relative inaction with regard to years of mass murder in Sudan. It is equally disturbing that much of the al-Bashir indictment could just as easily be applied to George Bush, the U.S. president. It is clear to most Iraqis that the chaos being reaped by the U.S. in their country was in fact deliberately sown by the U.S. to create a situation that would make any U.S. withdrawal almost impossible to pull off. While the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis — for which Bush and along with him, the American people who twice elected him, are responsible — is tragic, it should not be understated that the invasion itself was a crime against humanity.”
Let us hope that al-Bashir and Bush will have a chance to meet in The Hague soon!
FRED GRYZBOWSKI
Lynchburg
Some civility, please
As we move into the final months before a very close presidential race, there are letters and editorials filled with opinions and information that are increasingly negative and polarizing. This is true for supporters of both candidates.
Can we ask for a political climate that challenges each of us to do his or her homework, without resorting to inflammatory? It is vital to vote in November for the candidate of one’s choice. Disagree with the one you don’t support, talk up your own candidate, but base your choice on information from reliable sources and “in context” common sense. The candidates deserve this — they are both very good men.
LIBBY JARRETT
Lynchburg
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.
Click to send
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Ramblinman ) on July 23, 2008 at 7:45 am
Cosmo? Not sure what that is, But hey,
are’nt you part of the so called
“typical lynchburg mentality”?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( shoebox ) on July 23, 2008 at 6:24 am
Hey Cosmo, don’t you get it? luv2 = lugrad.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( molly brown ) on July 22, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Cosmo: Pot. Kettle. Black.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Bill Blackwell ) on July 22, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Fred,
Thanks for your courage and your truth.
You know be by my real name, but I’ve had to resort to a nom-de-plume for personal “safety/sanity.”
Keep up the good fight! BB
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( FedUpWithTRBC ) on July 22, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Truthseeker, The only reason the GOP picked such a pathetic candidate is because they don’t want a Republican in office for the next term. They don’t want to be the ones to have to clean up the mess that our “IDIOT IN CHIEF” created. The next four years are going to be pivotal for the survival of this country as we know it. Bush and his fellow “shrubs” have destabilized our economy, our foreign relations and our armed forces to such a degree that there is no telling how long it will take for America to bounce back. The GOP knows that if a Republican is elected, and they fail again, it will take decades before the American people will ever have faith in voting for a Republican for any office. To put it plain and simple, the GOP is too scared to take on this election.
Cosmo, It’s not the typical “Lynchburg mentality”. It’s the typical “LU/TRBC brainwashed mentality”.
Fred, Excellent letter.
(BTW, Don’t forget to go to druidmonkey.com to get your “War Crimes” shirts, hats and mugs
... I know, cheap plug.)
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Martha ) on July 22, 2008 at 4:39 pm
It’s been good to sit back for a while and just read some of your comments instead of posting. Gives you a breather and a calmer perspective.
Fred, good letter. Even though it was edited, it’s good they printed it.
It does take courage in Lynchburg to write a letter, post on this blog, have an opinion and a mind.Once your opinion is out there it’s laid bare for all to see and praise or just throw rotten tomatoes at. So yea Fred and Jackson Pollock and others. Yea to you too,luv...even though I could not agree w/ you less.
I am a proud liberal Democrat. I read, I think and I love Lynchburg.Liberal is NOT a dirty word and more people, like Fred, should be proud to use it.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 22, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Truthseeker. I just watched Sidney McBush as he ranted and raved about Obama. He is like Grandpa McCoy complaining that he can’t run as fast as Little Luke (for those who remember The Real McCoys). It is rather pathetic and, somewhat, sad; I’m almost embarrassed for McBush when he talks about the tension on the Iraqi/Pakistani border, forgetting that their borders are separated by . . . Iran. Unless the Democrats do something stupid, it is very likely that they will control the White House and, by a much larger majority, both houses of congress. Happy days will, truly, be here again.
Cosmo. Good decision. Peace.
luv: <silence>
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 22, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Cosmo,
Are you OK? You’re the one that threatened to “rip my heart out and show it to me” a week ago and now you are accusing ME of not being civil?
Why the double standard?
Why the hypocricy?
Why did you never do it?
(hint - U R A liberal weenie)
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 22, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Truthsqueaker,
I am very glad that the DNC doesn’t have any racists in it.
Jesse Jackson has NEVER mentioned race in a derogotive manner (HYMIE-TOWN, Barak talking down to N-----s)
Robert Byrd has known a few N-----s
Roger Clinton hit a couple of N-----s
Obama - “typical white person”
Michelle Obama -"for the first time in my adult life I am actually proud of my country”
Civil Rights Opposition
The complete list of the 21 Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes Senators:
- Hill and Sparkman of Alabama
- Fulbright and McClellan of Arkansas
- Holland and Smathers of Florida
- Russell and Talmadge of Georgia
- Ellender and Long of Louisiana
- Eastland and Stennis of Mississippi
- Ervin and Jordan of North Carolina
- Johnston and Thurmond of South Carolina
- Gore Sr. and Walters of Tennessee
- H. Byrd and Robertson of Virginia
- R. Byrd of West Virginia
Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Act was substantial enough to literally split the party in two. A whopping 40% of the House Democrats VOTED AGAINST the Civil Rights Act, while 80% of Republicans SUPPORTED it. Republican support in the Senate was even higher. Similar trends occurred with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was supported by 82% of House Republicans and 94% of Senate Republicans. The same Democrat standard bearers took their normal racists stances, this time with Senator Fulbright leading the opposition effort.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 22, 2008 at 2:18 pm
(luv2b)… Your posts are beyond anything that can be considered civil. By all means continue to show the world the typical Lynchburg mentality. 4now&4ever;from me you get...<silence>
Report Inappropriate Comment