Letters to the Editor for Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large


Published: July 14, 2008

U.S. energy policy lacking common sense
Michael Whorley’s math in his July 11 letter to the editor doesn’t add up. He deplores “drill, baby, drill,” but his solution might better be called “walk, baby, walk.”

Letters to the editorClick to send

The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the offshore continental shelf and ANWR together contain about 22 billion barrels of recoverable oil reserves in areas off-limits to drilling. With a typical reserve life of 15 years, this could supply as much as 4 million barrels of oil per day (Mbpd), offsetting one-third of our present imports. There’s no excuse for perpetuating the senseless moratorium on drilling.

Of the 20 Mbpd now consumed in the U.S., more than 80 percent is used for transportation. There are about 220 million cars and light trucks on the road in the nation.

In a good year, 15 million new cars and light trucks are produced and sold. So, if everyone were required to buy a hybrid (unlikely) that improves mileage efficiency by 40 percent, it would take 15 years to upgrade the fleet — more than the time required to drill offshore and in ANWR.

Conservation by itself is not a realistic solution to our near-term supply shortage. There is no viable alternative to liquid fuel for transportation. The technologies of hydrogen fuel cells and advanced batteries are nowhere near mature enough to be considered a substitute for most drivers in the foreseeable future.

There are many viable sources of petroleum: enhanced extraction from existing fields, heavy oil deposits, oil sands, oil shale, coal-to-liquid, and gas-to liquid conversion and even biofuels. Each of these requires enormous investment in new extraction or processing plants and lead times similar to development of the continental shelf and ANWR.

The oil shale deposits in the western U.S. are our largest domestic reserve, but Congress has also put this resource off-limits.

Let’s hope that the next administration and Congress have the good sense to lift restraints on exploitation of all potential domestic sources of petroleum and means of conservation, and the intelligence to let the free market determine which are the most economical.
ROBERT BATCHELDER
Lynchburg

The good and the bad
I was surprised that the June 29 News & Advance devoted four pages and eight pictures to the feature, “The Rites of Life: Of Age.” I will allow that the feature included some important information.

The same edition carried the disturbing news that Arise is closing and that The Gateway is in danger of closing — two organizations that are helping people to rebuild their lives after addiction.
JOHN W. JOHNSON
Lynchburg

Trashy bums!
Who are the jerks who throw their garbage and trash in my yard, your yard and the streets of Lynchburg?

If they can afford their cigarettes, Hardees and McDonalds, they can surely afford a garbage can!

BETTY ROBERTS
Lynchburg

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( David ) on July 15, 2008 at 12:53 pm

Some days the absurdity is just too great to comment on.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 15, 2008 at 8:12 am

Great letter Mr. Batchelder!  I would change a couple things in your thought process, but that is only because of my personal preference.  The world currently consumes 84 Mbpd.  The world currently produces 83 Mbpd.  If we in the U.S. CONSERVED 2 Mbpd, PRODUCED 2 Mbpd of additional crude, 2Mbpd of cellulosic ethanol, throw in a small amount for electric cars, hydrogen fuel celled cars, natural gas powered and one of those air powered cars, and we could tell Sam Rasoul and all of the other muslims in the middle east to go camel racing!

It will take a combination of things.  Something the democRATS and republicans do not currently understand.  You can’t drill your way, conserve your way or alternative your way out of the current mess. 

Congress has a 9% approval rating.  What else do you expect out of a bunch of lawyers?  The majority of congress simply do not have the brains to understand science and the benefits that can be derived when government gets out of the way.  Let the market go!  Bring down prices and take care of the American people!  Stop importing foreign oil and funding Madrassahs to train muslims to come over here and kill us!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 15, 2008 at 5:40 am

ROBERT BATCHELDER thinks the “free market” is being restrained.  What is we Communists?  Does the free market not restrain itself to what is the most profitable?  JOHN W. JOHNSON (ya doesn’t have to call him Johnson) is sad that taxpayers money will no longer be used to support people who chose to get high rather than productive.  BETTY ROBERTS hates them cigarette smoking McDonald’s eating jerks who throw garbage around.  All in all, it’s a “deep” morning here at the N&A;.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Randolph Knipp ) on July 14, 2008 at 11:38 pm

Mr. Batchelder, your letter is quite rational, very good.  I hope it gets attention.  My bet is that many posts here will again focus on their belief that you cannot do two things at once!  There are those who believe that one cannot conserve and also drill.  You can, as you suggest, and we should, as you also suggest.  It is not a choice, it is the pursuit of various options, and the market should decide the winners — and there may be multiple winners!  And may the public get economical transportation and power for the air conditioner from the efforts!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement