Letters to the Editor for Sunday, July 20, 2008
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Published: July 19, 2008
Time for nation-building right at home
The choices aren’t good, but whoever gets elected in November has his work cut out for him.
We need a president who will look out for Americans first, period. Nation-building overseas? We need to think about nation-building here in the good old U.S. of A.
Here are some ideas about Bush’s war and the price of oil: (1) Get out of Iraq and Afghanistan now! Quit wasting trillions of our dollars fighting meaningless wars for oil or otherwise. (2) This “war” is in Europe’s “backyard” and they can fight it if they want to. (3) Pull out of South Korea and all other countries we prop up with our military. Why are we bankrupting our country to defend countries that are perfectly capable of doing it themselves? (4) Use our military to round up the 12 million illegals in our country and secure our southern borders. I can’t break one law without the Feds looking for me, so why do 12 million people get away with it? (5) Tell Israel to quiet down about bombing Iran. This isn’t helping oil prices. Also cut our ties with Israel and quit sending them money. They have enough money, nuclear weapons, and can defend themselves. If they can’t, sorry, we can’t save the world. (6) Stop Wall Street speculation in the oil markets.
Ideas for lowering the middle-class tax burden: (1) If the U.S. isn’t going to have national healthcare then at least give dollar-for-dollar tax credits for the cost of our medical premiums. This will reward people who pay their own way and help stimulate the economy by putting money back in their hands. (2) Give tax deductions for people who pay child support. Why should they pay after-tax dollars for their children who they can’t deduct and get no tax “credit” for these payments? (3) Give the smokers and drinkers a break by cutting the taxes on these items by 90 percent. Where does all that tax money go? (4) Allow people to deduct interest paid to credit card companies. (5) Give major tax credits for the purchase of vehicles made in America that get 30 or more miles per gallon. The higher the MPG the greater the tax credit. This saves gas and can help our American automakers sell vehicles. Again, we are talking about America First, not some other country; we don’t care about them.
Finally, stand up for our privacy rights. I don’t know how much Verizon, AT&T and other phone companies paid our congressmen to grant them retroactive immunity for turning over our private records to George Bush’s government, but it probably didn’t take much.
These are probably the same mentally challenged men who voted to give Bush $167 billion to nation-build in Iraq for a few more months.
These aren’t radical ideas. I’m just looking for a few good men to bring some sanity back to our government. Are there any out there?
JOSEPH TURK
Bedford
No sense at all
Does expanded rail make sense?
The recent editorial promoting the “new” rail service to Washington, D.C., exposed some serious business and financial issues.
As stated it would serve 33,000 passengers the first year at a cost to state taxpayers of $1.9 million.
Let’s analyze the numbers:
w It would carry an average of 90 passengers per day. Is that 45 up and 45 back?
w It would cost $58 per passenger not including the fare paid by the passenger that currently is $74 each way.
Doesn’t make sense to me when adding a couple of cars (as necessary to meet demand) to the existing train service could solve the issue of “are typically booked solid” as quoted in the editorial. Easy to do since trains are expandable (unlike buses or airplanes) and most people book a day or more ahead.
DAN LYNCH
Lynchburg
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.
Click to send
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 22, 2008 at 9:21 am
ABC News:
“If you had it to do over again, knowing what you know now, would you support the surge?”
Obama:
“No, because keep in mind that question, you wouldn’t ... but keep in mind that kind of hypothetical is very difficult to know hindsight is 20-20 ... later ... but I think that what I’m absolutely convinced of is that at that time we had to change the political debate because the view of the Bush administration at that time was one that I just disagreed with.”
Can anyone interpret this nonsense for me? Obama is naive and has no gravitas.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 22, 2008 at 9:03 am
I’m not afraid of Obama “winning”. I afraid of America losing.
All of you democRATS need to realize that every president isn’t as corrupt as the Clintons. If GWB is as corrupt and as guilty as everyone here says.......why hasn’t anything been done about it? Why is the democRAT controlled house and senate not doing anything?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Individualist ) on July 21, 2008 at 5:12 pm
How about everyone read the BERLIN (Reuters) report for themselves. http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSL2047833920080720
Never accept anything said on this page; because someone is usually trying to mislead you.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 21, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Can anyone tell me what the top three legislative victories that Obama has achieved, both state and federal? 8 years should have given us something to go on!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 21, 2008 at 2:54 pm
JackSin PoleLock,
If you go back to watching MSNBC, you’ll double their viewership!
How exactly did I take the quote out of context? Was it in there or not?
You also left out the part about most of europe is pulling for Obama to win because he will raise our taxes. Higher taxes in the US is great for europe because it drives down the demand for our goods. It will give the euro an even better edge on us. They also don’t like Bush because he is a “cowboy”. News flash to you ‘ol demented one, europeans don’t like cowboys because their ancestors didn’t have the guts to cut loose from their familiar surroundings and make the trip to the new country. Other countries like for the U.S. to be weak because they like to “feel” superior. If you were a radical muslim, ask your self. Who would I vote for If I could vote for an american president.
The answer would always be Barak Hussein Obama. Not because he is a muslim, because I don’t think he is, but because he is a democRAT. And they have been weak for years since Truman. Where did all the real men go in the democRAT party?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 21, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Let’s play the new game “Quotes Out of Context . . .”
Some simpleton posted the following: “. . . governments wary of his inexperience and evolving policies fear the euphoria is overdone.”
I’ll post the following from the same Reuters story (Today) “Obama’s vow to pull U.S. troops out of Iraq and talk with Iran have won him admirers in Europe—particularly in Germany and France, countries that opposed the Iraq war and where President George W. Bush remains deeply unpopular because of the military adventures of his first term.”
Quotes are like polls (for clarification to the simpleton mentioned above, “polls” refers to surveys not people from Poland) . . .one can find one at any moment to meet ones needs.
OK . . . I’m tired of the new game. Let the conservative Bush supporters go back to their Faux News (unfair and unbalanced) and the comedian Rush, and I’ll go back to my New York Times (the national newspaper of record) and MSNBC. Shalom.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 21, 2008 at 10:46 am
BERLIN (Reuters) - European fans will cheer on U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama as he visits Berlin, Paris and London this week, but governments wary of his inexperience and evolving policies fear the euphoria is overdone.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 21, 2008 at 9:51 am
Obama is naive and has no gravitas! We can’t afford someone that is all talk and no walk to lead this country!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 21, 2008 at 5:51 am
(Ken) asks,.. “How bad does it have to get before someone steps forward”?… I don’t think it matters anymore Ken. Lots of people “step forward” but, the reality they inhabit has no relationship to the one I inhabit and probably none to yours either. We are no longer a Nation in anything but name. What binds us together? Bumper stickers and little flags made in China? We are a conglomeration of competing self interest groups. Each group has it’s own “news” that is incomprehensible to the others. Reality is as plastic as silly putty. It’s what happens when standards are thrown in the dumpster. Believe ANYTHING you wish, it’s your right. Act accordingly, no one dare find fault with your reasoning or lack there of. It would be UN-American. There in we find the rub. In order for people to agree to meet, one day, in the same place, it is a prerequisite that they all be working off the same map. We can’t even agree on what way is NORTH!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Fred ) on July 20, 2008 at 11:31 am
The Chrysler building in Manhattan was bought by Arabs. Anheiser-Bush was bought by Belgians. GM will ultimately go bankrupt (unless it is bought by Nissan, which is controlled by Renault - those pesky French again). Speaking of the French, Areva is French. Nearly nothing worth anything is manufactured here anymore. The dollar is not worth a damn in Europe.
Please refresh my memory. Did I ever mention that America is unraveling?
Report Inappropriate Comment