Letters to the Editor for Sunday, July 13, 2008

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Logan Anderson

Published: July 12, 2008

Court’s gun ruling grounded in history
Normally, I read the letters to the editor for the sake of gauging the most recent liberal rant for the utopia that is Socialism. But today, I felt compelled to respond to the absolute lack of historical education contained in David McLoughlin’s July 8 letter.

Letters to the editorClick to send

Apparently, he and I live in separate Americas. To begin, I believe in the inherent goodness of this nation which was bequeathed to us by our forefathers, not a nation of flagellating self-doubters who refer to the authors of the Constitution as “a bunch of slaveholders writing about equality.” Secondly, I read and study history, as opposed to revising it to satiate my guilt for having been born in America.

As a clear correction, James Madison, primary author of the United States Constitution said of slavery, “We have seen the mere distinction of color made in the most enlightened period of time, a ground of the most oppressive dominion ever exercised by man over man.” In addition, Madison held a leading position in the American Colonization Society, a group formed nearly at our nation’s founding that encouraged and worked for the emancipation of all men.

I could write a treatise on the likes of John Jay, Benjamin Franklin and John Adams who were in similar groups, or men like George Washington, George Wythe and John Randolph who freed their slaves upon considering the mantle of freedom bestowed by Providence. But suffice it to say, our forefathers were hardly the men described by this blanket statement.

In the second, to infer that Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion in Heller, which by itself was succinct and well written, was nefarious and “activist” is not only wrong but borders on the absurd. The duty of the Supreme Court is twofold: to apply the Constitutional “litmus test” to written law and oversee disputes between States. As this applies, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” (emphasis mine), seems pretty straightforward.

Also, when one looks at the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, the Protection clauses of the Third and Fourth, Due Process, Jury and Punishment clauses of the Fifth through Eighth, a pattern of enumerating personal rights is clear. Does the letter writer suggest that in a document as poured over as this, ratified by 13 member states after being thoroughly read over by those legislatures, there was no grammarian to tell everyone they were putting a right given to the states (Nine and Ten) in the wrong place? Further, when they clearly meant of the People everywhere else to regard the individual, then why define it differently in one place? Either the writers of the Bills of Rights meant for this right to be imparted to the individual member of society or the American Medical Association should regard the Second Amendment as the first recorded case of ADHD in our history.

To answer Mr. McLoughlin’s question, as a citizen and gun owner, along with many of my brethren, I would wholly and willfully answer the call to militia should it ever be necessary to protect this nation from harm. I hope that he can and should expect this of law abiding gun owners in this nation.

Finally, no right is without limit, as Justice Scalia wisely allowed for in the opinion. You cannot yell fire in a theater, and you aren’t allowed to publish U.S. military movements in a newspaper. Is this not a limit to the First Amendment? We cannot walk into a Federal building or airport without being subject to search. Is this not a limit to the Fourth? I believe Justice Scalia did not apply “activism” to the decision, and that he fulfilled his duty to the letter.
MICHAEL ERNETTE
Lynchburg

Drill at home
Are you aware of the voting records of the people you have helped to place in office? Many of these politicians are not looking out for your welfare, but rather their own. They need to be replaced.

The high costs at the pump, the high electrical bills with new increases coming, the higher food prices have all come from the hands of your political leaders who are paying much more attention to the environmentalists rather than looking out for the majority of the populous.

Yes, clean air and a cleaner environment are great, but at what cost to the average American? We have a vast supply of petroleum within our own borders. All we need to do is drill for it. Yes it will take a while to bring it to the market, but look at all the time that has been wasted already. Back in 1998 the cost of a barrel of oil was $19 and that is when President Clinton placed a hold on any future drilling in Alaska. Now we are using vast quantities of our grain products to produce bio-fuels, which give us fewer miles per gallon in our vehicles, don’t burn as cleanly and jack up the cost of many of the food supplies that we consume. Make a call to your senators and to your congressman and tell them to vote to drill within our own land, let’s gain our independence from foreign markets. If they refuse to comply we have an election coming up soon enough for you to make your displeasure with them known.

One last item, both of the candidates for president are in the pockets of the environmentalists. This will guarantee us that we will never be energy efficient in the near future. Their goal is only to find a cleaner alternative to our energy needs, even though we have more than enough oil within our own country to supply our needs for many a year, if we would only go after it. If you all want some relief, call your elected officials and demand that they drill here and drill now.
TED SPOLOWITZ
Lynchburg

 

We’ve been invaded
While Iraq was being “liberated,” our county was under a peaceful takeover virtually undetected. The invaders are at the other end of the gas pump nozzle, at the tip of our fork, playing in the floor with our children and pets and covering our backs. They’re either inflating the prices, poisoning our food, or limiting us on all of the things we’ve become dependent on them for. Manufacturing, food production and jobs have all been outsourced. Foreign countries supply most of our needs. We’re depending on, in some cases, our enemies for our survival. We’re being held hostage!

Perhaps President Bush’s real “Axes of Evil” are the corporations who sold us out, with the help of our own government. Yes, greed and thirst for power have brought us to this point.

We need a revolution in this country, in the form of mass voting, to take our country back and regain the respect and trust that has been lost.

It is sad and shocking to see how far the mighty have fallen in such a short period of time, but that is what happens when the proverbial fox is allowed into the hen house, destruction and devastation.

Let’s keep that from happening again. Please!
BARBARA HARE
Forest

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 15, 2008 at 3:43 pm

Michael.  Don’t beat yourself up over this.  Everyone makes mistakes.  Your apology is accepted, but keep up your constant search for the truth which often leads to facts we would rather deny.  Peace.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Michael Ernette ) on July 15, 2008 at 3:06 pm

I will certainly bear that in mind, Cosmo.  So long as you accept that just because a person holds a conservative view point does not make him a neocon, a lockstepper, or a member of TRBC.  In fact, I dislike the neocon agenda, and am a practicing Catholic.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 15, 2008 at 9:07 am

Apology accepted (Michael Ernette).  But, in future, don’t assume that everyone who finds fault with America is a “Liberal” or a “socialist” who feels “guilt for having been born in America”.  Some of us are Capitalists who are disgusted by the mindless ignorance we see in so many of our fellow Americans.  I can’t spell for crap… But I know damn well that 9/11 didn’t happen because America tolerates gay people, and Islamic Terrorists don’t conspire against us because “They hate freedom”.  I also know that EVERY Supreme Court Judge is a “political appointment” and an “activist” when ever they get the chance.  “Activism”, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Michael Ernette ) on July 14, 2008 at 10:45 pm

Watch the paper, I publicly apologize for this error.  Thank you for correcting my inaccuracy, Gentlemen.  Madison’s appearance in abolitionist documentation, as well as his well documented abhorrance of slavery in his writings led me down the wrong path.  I should have done my research better.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Michael Ernette ) on July 14, 2008 at 10:07 pm

What can I say? When I’m wrong, admit I am wrong.  After further review, James Madison was a slave holder.  I will clarify with a letter that is certainly forthcoming.  The truth is that he abhorred slavery, which is not in dispute, and I was led to believe that he was an abolitionist but several of my own sources.
However, note that I am not one spouting pure vitriol toward you, Pollack and Cosmo.  Again, I am sorry, and will correct my error insofar as my facts were inaccurate.  I am NOT a psuedo researcher.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Whorley2 ) on July 14, 2008 at 9:07 pm

While realizing that neither drilling
nor conservation is going to get us out of our present situation, I will offer you a couple of alternatives already available. There is presently in use, already in Germany and Japan a 5 stage
compressed air engine which drives its vehicle for up to 800 miles at a rate of up to 65 mph. No pollution, except for the small amount of electricity needed to run the car’s charger. This is one of many alternatives which Americans are not gaining the benefit of. If we can move beyond our self serving individualism to be responsible for a securer future by being weaned off oil and thereby all hostile connection with the Middle East,
would we not be in a better position to take care of our own as well as broker the differences which have existed there for thousands of years. Lastly, I met Mr. Rasoul at a gathering recently and have not been more impressed with a young man out to serve the public interest in some time. Hear him speak, and all the adolescent stupidities one might hurl at his candidacy will fall by the wayside.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 14, 2008 at 8:21 pm

luv.  So being a Muslim disqualifies an American citizen from acquiring an elected office?  What has happened to the first amendment?  Or in the case of Obama, just being labeled a Muslim by a ridiculous number of uneducated Americans works to his disadvantage?  What kind of America are we living in? 

You call yourself a patriot?  You, dear luv, have become a Marxist in that for Marxists “religion” is banned because it is the “opiate of the masses”; in your case, luv, religion is OK as long as it is the right religion that drinks the grape Kool-ade of the mainstream Christians.  You call yourself a patriot?  You are a piece of work and no more worthy of calling yourself an American than John Walker Lindh.  Shalom.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 14, 2008 at 8:10 pm

“Historian” Ernette.  What edition was the EB?  Quote from Montpelier site (home of James Madison): 

“Though Madison did contemplate emancipating his slaves, he never did. Madison felt that slaves could not be freed unless ‘...they are permanently removed beyond the region occupied by, or allotted to a white population.‘“

Case closed on the reliability of this pseudo researcher.  Try your hand at becoming a newscaster for Fox.  Peace.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 14, 2008 at 3:03 pm

Here is what you posted, ya doofus. ...“the American Colonization Society, a group formed nearly at our nation’s founding that encouraged and worked for the emancipation of all men.“.. And THAT is total Baloney AND a farcical interpretation of history.  It was formed to get rid of free blacks.  So, Washington & Jefferson (and others) had slaves.  That means there were “NO” slave owning signers of the document in question?  Correct me if I am wrong, but David McLoughlin didn’t say they ALL were slave owners.. did he?  Well, well, well.  What kind of a line of crap do you have in store for us next Mike?  And NO, Abe Lincoln DIDN’T invent the microwave oven no matter what it states in your Encyclopedia Brittanica.  (do you believe this guy?) I always thought it was spelled “Britannica”.  But hey, you are the spelling expert, right?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Michael Ernette ) on July 14, 2008 at 11:54 am

Farsical intrepretation of history?  These are facts, searchable on the computer you are reading them from, or at the local library in the Encyclopedia Brittanica.  Wishing it away doesn’t make them false.  Madison was the primary author of the US Constitution.  Madison did not own slaves.  Nor did Franklin, Jay, or Adams.  Washington and some others freed theirs.  Jefferson and his ilk did not.  In regard to Lincoln, he was a proponent of the colonization of Liberia by free blacks.  Look it up.  Again, I love how no one on this board has brought one iota of researchable fact to dispute ANYTHING I have said.  They have only lumped me in with a President and Party that I am not pleased with, and a pastor whose church I have never attended.  Come on, folks, if you’re going to dismantle my argument, and say that I am trying “to sound academic and look(ing)foolish,“ prove me wrong.  Where is your truth, your evidence?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement