Well, What Do You Know? Nukes in Iraq
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
The News & Advance
Published: July 13, 2008
There is nothing — repeat, nothing — that a liberal hates more than to be confronted by the truth.
The smart liberal (and there are few) will immediately begin changing his position, slithering away from past beliefs, now discredited by the facts. An example would be Sen. Barack Obama who, when confronted by evidence on the ground in Iraq that the nation is stabilizing, immediately began modifying his pledge that the troops would begin to come home the minute he takes the presidential oath.
The reaction of most liberals when the truth hits them like a ton of bricks is simply to ignore it.
Case in point: the successful removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake — high-grade radioactive material used in nuclear enrichment programs — from Saddam Hussein’s Tuwaitha nuclear research facility.
Last week, The Associated Press broke the story as the last of the material arrived in Canada at a facility of Cameco Corp. where it will eventually be used to produce electric power. The United States brokered the Iraqi government’s sale of the yellowcake to Cameco and provided the extraordinary security surrounding the transfer of the material to Canada.
According to the AP, the negotiations lasted more than a year, occurring behind a thick veil of secrecy out of fears that terrorist groups would try to get their hands on the material. Once the deal was signed, the 3,500 barrels had to be transported by road to Baghdad, flown to the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and then taken aboard a U.S.-flagged ship for an 8,500-mile voyage to Montreal.
The Iraqi government, the U.S. military and a slew of international diplomats worked feverishly — and successfully, we’d like to point out — to get the yellowcake out of the country and away from those who would have loved to get their hands on it.
(In the 1990s, Washington had brokered a similar deal with Moscow to spirit weapons-grade uranium out of the former Soviet republics to America.)
Think back to late 2002 and early 2003 and the months prior to the March toppling of Saddam Hussein’s murderous regime. Virtually every major Western nation — France, Germany, Russia, China — believed the dictator possessed WMD (weapons of mass destruction), but only America and Great Britain insisted that the situation had to be strongly addressed, after years of the United Nations’ dithering. Then there were reports that Saddam’s agents had been in the African nation of Niger trying to buy yellowcake; CIA employee Valerie Plame claimed Bush administration officials “outed” her after her husband, former Ambassador Joe Wilson, purportedly found no evidence of such a buying trip.
The facility at Tuwaitha had a storied past and was the target of a daring Israeli air force bombing raid in 1981 that heavily damaged Saddam’s weapons program. The 23,000-acre complex at Tuwaitha is filled with bunkers, research facilities and storage sites; experts say it will take years to completely clean up Tuwaitha and other sites across the country.
Who’s to say what else from Saddam’s toy box have been found, but are still cloaked behind the veil of secrecy and security?
The full story of Saddam’s nuclear weapons program and his “ambitions” for the region may never come to light; true secrets have a way of staying secret. What this episode shows us is that the regime headed by this man desired to cause havoc in the world and possessed the means to do so.
And that, folks, is fact.
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 19, 2008 at 5:28 pm
OH Jackson! Please talk to me! I can’t live without your biased opinion everyday. Since Dan Rather got fired for lying, I don’t have near the liberal bias that I used to get.
Please, Please, Please!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 18, 2008 at 1:13 pm
luv2bstupid: <silence>
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on July 18, 2008 at 10:24 am
Jackson,
I know what you mean about McCain. He isn’t quite like Obama though, 57 states? Did he mean the 57 Islamic states?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on July 17, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Randy. Besides keeping us safe from terrorists attacks (which is as bogus as saying he kept us safe from elephant attacks, too, since we haven’t had any since his administration), name one thing positive that we could give Bush credit for? W hasn’t gotten one thing right since he became President. Name one thing, Randy.
Did anyone see the Daily Show last night? Stewart played Bush’s news conference, which ran at the same time as Bernanke was testifying before Congress. Even Bush’s lackeys can’t get it right. What Bush was saying and what the chairman of the Fed. was saying about the economy were completely
opposites. And which one is the economist? And which one was lying? Watch it. It is almost as funny as McCain trying to answer the question about birth control and Viagra or the South Carolina governor trying to think of one way McCain’s economic policy is different from Bush’s. The problem is that Bush has no economic policy except “feed the rich” and McCain’s “policy” is the same.
Seriously, McCain’s brain lapses are very frightening. Czechoslovakia? Heaven help us if he becomes President. The only true thing going for him that makes him different from Bush is that he can pronounce “nuclear,“ such as his statement of “If I bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb Iran, I will use nuclear bombs.“ Scary. Peace.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Randolph Knipp ) on July 14, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Oh, I forgot, Kucinich dropped 34 of his Articles of Impeachment… It’s now only one, that being Dennis’s assertion that the President fabricated evidence of WMD efforts in order to deceive Congress. “W” did a marvelous job, Congress jumped right on board! You’d think people would give “W” some credit for some jobs well done!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Randolph Knipp ) on July 14, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Gosh, Dennis Kucinich’s 35 Articles of Impeachment are national news everywhere! They play out on the front pages of most newspapers all over the country, and of course Congress is totally up in arms about them. Bush probably has only minutes left before the truth really gets out and the country is finally freed from the tyranny, the subterfuge, the awful horrors of the current administration. And the awful lies that the administration is always throwing out there, like, ..., well like you know — all those lies! Just ask anyone. Ask Nancy Pelosi. She’ll tell you. All those awful lies, like…
ask Kucinich.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( bigjimm ) on July 14, 2008 at 11:06 am
What the writer of this article doesn’t know about the manufacture of nuclear weapons is apparently everything.
The fact that this yellowcake was tagged by U.N. inspectors after the first Gulf War is a piece of info that has no place in this editorial which is nothing more than a right-wing rant.
The simple truth of the matter is that liberals nor anyone else has heard any truth out of Bush’s regime in the last 7+ years. And that’s a fact.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 14, 2008 at 8:53 am
( jimofforest ) Tell us all how many nuclear weapons YOU could make from “550 metric tonnes of yellowcake”. I bet it’s the same amount that Iraq made…Right? So, should we declare war on “Yellowcake” now Einstein? Or, is today “Hate the Spanish” day? And, just for the hell of it, don’t you think Peace to some Christians is when everybody is under Christian laws? By the way, is everybody who disagrees with you automatically a “Liberal”? I’m probably more Conservative than you are you twit.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( David McLoughlin ) on July 14, 2008 at 7:34 am
I missed a few “facts”. Isnt it a long long long long way from yellowcake to a deliverable WMD? Where did this yellowcake come from-Niger? Isnt it just too convenient to suggest that Saddams toy box is still unknown. Thats not a fact.
I, for one, also want Obama to change his mind when he has new facts. Slavishly holding to a position is for his opponent.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( LynchburgRes ) on July 14, 2008 at 7:22 am
Obviously the author gets the news from FAUX…errrr I mean Fox News.
At worst, Cosmo, this editorial is a lame attempt to take everyone’s mind off of the 35 articles of impeachment that Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced to congress. If half the allegations are true, and they must be, since the Republican /neo-con controlled major news networks are NOT covering it, then our entire system of news coverage and the Constitution itself is at risk.
The Republican party has pretty much scrapped the Constitution to make money for themselves and scuttled the education system to help folks swallow that all is right with “the system”.
Report Inappropriate Comment