Voters Deserve a Debate in the Fifth District

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

The News & Advance
Published: October 3, 2008

Several weeks ago, we took Democrat Mark Warner to the proverbial woodshed when he tried to avoid a debate with Republican Jim Gilmore, his opponent in the U.S. Senate race.

Warner, sitting on a double-digit lead in the polls and on top of a pile of money in the bank, bowed out of a live debate that would have been televised across the state, evidently afraid the desperate Gilmore would bloody his nose in front of the voters.

Eventually, Warner came to his senses, and last night’s statewide debate originating from Roanoke was the result. Voters, who deserve the opportunity to hear their candidates speak on the issues, were the winners.

Well, now it’s Fifth District Republican incumbent Virgil Goode who’s ducked out of a long-standing debate with his Democratic challenger, Tom Perriello.

Let’s head out back to the woodshed, Mr. Goode.

The NBC affiliate in Charlottesville, according to Media General News Service, had been working with representatives of both campaigns for several months and thought the Oct. 7 debate was a go. The station had blocked off time on its schedule for the event and was all prepared. Locally, WSET was scheduled to pick up the broadcast.

At the last minute, however, the congressman informed the news director of the Charlottesville station he wouldn’t show up: A fundraiser was on the schedule for Tuesday night, and that took precedence.

Goode and Perriello have held face-to-face events throughout the district. They’ve all been local events, not district-wide debates. The Oct. 7 debate, which would have been broadcast from Charlottesville, would have been the first debate to be televised throughout the district. Voters from Schuyler in Nelson County to Virgilina in Halifax County, from Chatham in Pittsylvania to Rocky Mount in Franklin would have had the opportunity to see their veteran congressman and his challenger square off on the important issues facing this nation.

But, unless Rep. Goode changes his mind, the voters of the Fifth District won’t have that opportunity. And that’s a shame.

Goode campaign officials said they were trying to reschedule and find a good date for a televised debate, but time is growing short. There are only four weeks until Election Day.

A debate is an opportunity for voters to see their representatives and their would-be representatives in action. It’s as American as mom and apple pie.

Mr. Goode is selling his constituents short by denying them such an opportunity.

The residents of the Fifth District deserve better.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Walker ) on October 11, 2008 at 12:01 pm

Jouxster, I agree about the sad state of things and about Washington not really listening.  What I like about Tom is that he doesn’t play games, doesn’t make excuses, and he keeps his eye on the ball.  He isn’t running as a “me-too” Democrat, but as someone who knows how to ask the RIGHT questions, bring the RIGHT people to the table, and make the RIGHT decisions for the common man and woman.  I really don’t want to vote for a guy whose only real skill is fixing traffic tickets and government forms.  I want a leader who thinks bigger, works harder, and who lives by his commitments.  That’s why I decided on Tom Perriello.  Look for this guy to emerge as a national leader - it’s long overdue!  Anyway, thanks for your comments.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jouxster ) on October 10, 2008 at 3:02 pm

I can tell you what Virgil does. His office has helped me 4 times with government screwups and his assistants helped everytime. He hires good people. As far as not knowing issues you might be right. He never wanted to find out what it’s like to get rid of American jobs to Mexico/overseas. Clinton voted to allow it.. Bush allowed it to continue. Southside is a wasteland of unemployed/depressed people who have strong respect and will. They did not want to stop working, not unionized, and paid a salary they could raise their family with. Repubicans and Demoncrats are full of crap as far as helping the little man. The little man has lost.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Walker ) on October 08, 2008 at 10:17 pm

There is only ONE reason Virgil won’t debate: ignorance of the facts is the only way he can possibly pull this one out of the ditch.  If his constituents actually knew the truth about his record, they would be appalled.  Perriello is clearly more intelligent, more experienced at getting things done, more honest, more capable, and more insightful than any candidate who has appeared on the political stage in years, and Goode knows it. 

So instead of a spirited discussion of the issues , we have a six-term Congressman running away like a schoolgirl from a debate that he OUGHT to win in his sleep.  Not exactly the kind of guy I want representing me in Washington…

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Nancy33 ) on October 05, 2008 at 12:57 am

CHECK YOUR FACTS.

There was NEVER any agreement between the Goode campaign and the NBC station to participate in the debate. Goode had a fundraiser scheduled for the date. The station outright lied about there being a scheduling conflict, inferring that Gooode chickened out. He was apparently unaware the whole thing was going to happen in the first place.

If there was some sort of verbal agreement with Tucker Barnes, obviously things were never set in stone, nor was anything relayed to the candidate.

I am not a Goode fan, but fair is fair. Contact his campaign for their side of the story.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( letstalk ) on October 04, 2008 at 10:32 pm

Virgil is not as you say Punking out…
he never agreed to it.

I saw an interview recently on the southside with Perriello recently. I was trying to figure out why he was even running. He was telling the person doing the interview how he had gone to the foreign countries to do all these things, came back to Washingto and reported his finding to the higher ups but no one would listen to what he had to say. My thought was if the folks in Washington would not listen to you then, what makes you think they are going to listen now. He also mainly talked the whole time about what Virgil was doing wrong, but never talked about what he would do. I still don’t know what he does to make a living.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Diana Mead ) on October 04, 2008 at 10:15 pm

C’mon, Virgil - give the voters a chance to see you and your opponent go mano-a-mano.  It is extremely, transparently lame to punk out now.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on October 04, 2008 at 7:18 am

Debates are a huge waste of time. Nothing new comes out except for the hoped for gaffe or great one-liner or put-down like the one Bentsen used to take Quayle off at the knees.
The people that watch these things are like the stock car “fans” who just watch to see the big wreck.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( letstalk ) on October 04, 2008 at 6:34 am

From what i read in a news article, Tucker Watkins agreed to the debate for Virgil. I know from experience when you want to get Virgil on a tv show or a radio show you go to Virgil directly not someone else. Virgil schedules his OWN PERSONAL APPEARANCES. So when a tv station wants to host a debate or an interview. Call Virgil himself. Don’t talk to his campaign staff. Believe me. I know what I am talking about.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement