Perhaps, A Bit of Good News About Oil Prices
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
The News & Advance
Published: May 19, 2008
With oil prices still hovering at near-record highs, a survey of oil and gas industry executives offered some good news last week. A majority of them believes oil prices will drop below $100 a barrel by the end of the year.
That would be welcome relief for beleaguered families who are putting more and more of their paychecks into the gas tank of the family car or cars.
On Monday, oil was fetching more than $127 a barrel. And for now, the end doesn’t appear to be anywhere in sight. Those prices on the commodity markets translate to record high prices for gasoline — prices that reached an average of $3.77 a gallon for regular gas over the weekend. In Virginia, the average price for a gallon of regular set a new record at $3.64, according to AAA Mid-Atlantic.
Among the 372 petroleum industry executives surveyed by KPMG LLP, 55 percent said they think the price of crude will drop by the end of the year. Another 21 percent predicted that a barrel of crude would drop to between $101 and $110, which would offer some relief at the gas pumps.
And why do the oil executives see a drop in the price of crude? The expectation of increased investment in new and renewed sources of oil. Apparently, the price of crude oil has reached the plateau where the executives see the profitability of returning to the oil fields.
“The expectation of increased investment by U.S. energy companies shows oil and gas executives are deeply concerned about energy security,” said Bill Kimble, who oversees the global energy institute at KPMG, the audit, tax and advisory firm.
Crude oil prices have nearly doubled in the past year. Most of that rise has been blamed on rising demand from the rapidly developing economies of China and India.
There’s no unanimity on where the future of oil prices is going, however. Oil price prognosticator Goldman Sachs said last week that oil prices could rise to as much as $200 a barrel within two years. Others have said that prices could plummet to as low as $40 a barrel during the same period. Wouldn’t that be nice?
Meanwhile, conservation of gasoline seems to be on the minds of many auto buyers in Lynchburg. Buyers are beginning to take serious looks at vehicles that get better fuel economy — hybrids like the one manufactured by Toyota that get as much as 48 miles per gallon.
Not all of them are that good on gasoline, but many of them are a vast improvement over the gas-guzzling SUVs that have turned a trip to the gas station into a nightmare.
One general sales manager said recently that expensive gasoline has forced some folks into the automobile market. The fuel prices, he said, “stimulate people to get out of their SUVs ... They like their SUV, they like its size, but they would rather pay on a brand new car than on gas.”
Conservation of gasoline (and dollars) on a national basis could also reduce the demand for gas. And with that could come a reduction in prices the old-fashion way — by reducing demand. It would be nice to see the OPEC countries drown in the magnificent supplies of oil they are sitting on and producing in measured quantities at prices that are filling their treasuries with petrodollars.
For many, nonetheless, the rising gasoline prices have forced changes in the vehicles they drive and their driving habits. They are consolidating more shopping trips and they are thinking twice about weekend travels or even that vacation this summer.
Let’s hope the oil executives are right about the falling oil prices. And even if they do fall, folks should continue with the conservation practices they have been pushed toward in the past year. Oil is still a finite source of energy.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Lburg Original ) on May 21, 2008 at 10:50 pm
The laws of nature and economics will prevail. At the current demand of 87M barrels per day and supply of 85M barrels per day the price of oil will continue to increase until the market finds equilibrium. The two largest nations in the world, China and India, have increased their usage of automobiles by a factor of 10 and the number of cars per household is far less than the US so the demand for oil is going to increase. As much as we hate to admit it there is a finite quantity of oil. If you owned the only cow in town, what would you charge for a gallon of milk?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 20, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Forget it (THINK). All anybody ever gets is scripture & insults.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( bigjimm ) on May 20, 2008 at 4:02 pm
The problem with this line of discussion is that it is off topic. The original thread is lost and three or four people start beating that old dead horse and no, I’m not referring to Rev. Falwell, I’m talking about the permanent division that exists in this town.
Since I really won’t get into this again I will say that as a long time resident of this city I feel that Jerry Falwell’s positives far outweigh his negatives.
My biggest gripe with those ardent supporters of his is that I recognize the fact that he was so much like all of us, he was human. Some of his supporters seem to lose sight of that fact at times and seem to give him almost Biblical reverence. There is a certain amount of risk to that.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on May 20, 2008 at 3:40 pm
I would love to have a civil discussion with Cosmo, but his only retort is how educated that he is. Not that he has amounted to much in life, but how he is the most arrogant, educated, superior poster child on here. Mister Cosmo, you may be educated, but if you or your two idiot kids don’t teach some type of engineering, you are nothing more than filler on a status sheet. Let me guess, you teach art appreciation at Randolph College? How ‘bought getting some of those skanky girls over here and let the Mount Pilot girls teach them how to shave their legs and armpits?
Fot the last time, you prejudiced idiot, I am not part of the LU crowd. I am just not LU-phobic, nor feel threatened by them as much as I fear your “elitist” attitude and kind.
Cosmo is the type of person that Obama will put on his staff. A lot of degrees matched only by the hot air.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( THINK ) on May 20, 2008 at 3:11 pm
I would like to know the criteria used to decide which comments to post and which are omitted. I submitted a comment that was not controversial, derogatory, infammatory, was not an ad hominid attack on anyone; just a simple request for a civil discussion. Yet this comment was omitted. I would like to know who is responsible for this censorship, what criteria they use, and is it consistent, or up to the whims and prejudices of a live mediator.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( THINK ) on May 20, 2008 at 11:55 am
luv2bliberal, and if you join us later LU Grad, Grandma and others who tend to support LU/Falwell: Though I may agree that LU/Falwell-bashing can get tiresome (and you perhaps may agree that there must be a reason so many commentators on this post do it), I offer a serious and sincere request that one of you respond directly to Cosmo’s criticisms of LU, Falwell, TRBC, its followers and supporters, their dogma, and how it effects their rationale and processes of thought in the modern world. Not childish name-calling and comments intended to “burn” the other (no pun intended LU supporters), but a serious and cogent reply to these valid criticisms--I believe it could be enlightening (not a referral to the Enlightenment, so no offense intended) and beneficial for individuals on both sides of the fence. I hope Cosmo’s intellect and LU-supporter’s grounding in the directives of scripture will allow for a serious and civil discussion.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 20, 2008 at 11:53 am
You know, I ask a simple question. All that ever comes back are insults. It’s not like I expect any different, but, it sure would be nice if SOMEBODY supporting Liberty would for once ANSWER a question! But, we can always count on (luv2bliberal) for a heaping helping of anti-education. I almost miss that when I leave Lynchburg. (only kidding)
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on May 20, 2008 at 9:39 am
Cosmo suffers from F.E., Falwell envy, similar to penis envy.
Even though fat ‘ol mister jerry never earned his PHD, he amounted to a lot more in life than Wafflefool and his 56 PHDs from Moscow U. with his 32 undergrads from Bejing U.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( bigjimm ) on May 20, 2008 at 8:10 am
Is there any subject that does not somehow relate to LU or J. Falwell?
This is becoming tiresome.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( bigjimm ) on May 20, 2008 at 7:17 am
Interesting editorial but you are talking out of both sides of your face.
You do touch on the truth. The high cost of fuel is driving the move to sensible conservation and frugal choices in the type of vehicles being purchased and designed. This is already the reality for the rest of the world.
You then hope the price of fuel falls, but you state that “folks” should continue with conservation practices.
Of course if the prices fall “folks” won’t conserve. They will buy SUVs. Conservation is not the American Way.
If the price of fuel falls it should be taxed back to $4.00.
The world is changing fast and high fuel prices are here to stay. The faster we get used to this new reality the better for all of us.
Conservation and frugality are things that most Americans are going to have to get used to, welcome to the world.
Report Inappropriate Comment