House GOP to Blame for Failure of Special Session

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

The News & Advance
Published: July 19, 2008

The General Assembly’s special session, called by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine to take up various proposals to deal with the state’s looming transportation crisis, ended in utter failure.

But those with egg on their faces are neither the governor nor the Democrats who control the State Senate. It’s the anti-tax, heads-in-the-sand wing of the Republican Party that calls the shots in the House of Delegates.

Gov. Kaine, to his credit, put forward a credible plan to provide approximately $1.1 billion a year to pay for various transportation initiatives ranging from routine maintenance across the state to new construction projects in Northern Virginia and Tidewater, as well as mass transit and rail projects. His main funding sources were statewide versions of taxes and fees that Republicans in the House had themselves voted to increase, albeit indirectly, in 2007 when they created two regional transportation authorities for the expressed purpose of levying taxes and fees to pay for construction projects. (The state Supreme Court declared those bodies unconstitutional because they were unelected.)

As we’ve said in the past, a straightforward increase in the gas tax — the tax established to pay for transportation in Virginia and unchanged since 1986 — is the most logical and philosophically honest way to pay for the state’s needs. Still, we understand the political reasons the governor chose his particular approach.

The Senate, led by Majority Leader Dick Saslaw, substituted a 6-penny increase in the gas tax spread over six years as its way to pay for the majority of transportation needs. That plan, unfortunately, was dead before it even arrived in the House where even some Democrats were uncomfortable with raising the gas tax.

But at least Democrats in the Assembly recognize the seriousness of the problem the commonwealth faces in the coming years. The House Republicans and their allies treated the entire special session as a game of political brinksmanship to be played with the governor and the Democrats in advance of the 2009 state elections.

Just consider these three sordid tales of politics from the session.

First, Attorney General Bob McDonnell, the GOP’s likely nominee for governor in 2009, proposed that nothing be done until a full-fledged, independent audit of the transportation department could be undertaken and completed.

What that clever little ruse masked over was the fact that, since 2001, VDOT has undergone eight such audits, which tallied and corrected the mismanagement of the department that occurred under the administration of Republican Gov. Jim Gilmore.

Not to be outdone, Del. Phillip Hamilton, R-Newport News, put forth his funding proposal: 30 percent of money from future increases in business at the state’s seaports and Dulles and Reagan National airports in Northern Virginia. How much money would that mean for construction and maintenance, asked Minority Leader Ward Armstrong of Henry County. Neither Hamilton nor any other House Republican knew.

The capper was a proposal by Del. Christopher Saxman, R-Staunton, whose proposal to pay for transportation was — now get this — to direct all revenues from offshore oil drilling to VDOT. In true House fashion of passing the real work off on somebody else, the measure was dependent on the Democratic Congress lifting the national drilling moratorium. (And we all know that a snowball has a better chance of survival in you-know-where than that happening anytime soon.)

More than 40 years ago, when “tax” was as dirty a word as it is today, then-Gov. Mills E. Godwin came into office with a grand plan to bring the commonwealth’s higher-education system into the modern age with the creation of the Virginia Community College System.

Godwin, an arch-conservative who later won the governor’s office as a Republican, proposed the state sales tax to pay for his initiative. There was howling and screaming from one end of the state to the other from the usual suspects, but Godwin pushed and cajoled until the Assembly approved the plan.

In the years since, who can possibly deny the success of the state’s community colleges? And it all came about because Godwin was a true leader, statesman and political visionary.

The so-called leaders of the Republican majority in the House of Delegates refuse to acknowledge the existence of a statewide transportation need; they only grudgingly admit there’s a transportation problem in Northern Virginia and Tidewater. The “solutions” the propose for those areas aren’t really solutions at all and, in typical Richmond fashion, simply pass the buck and responsibility for action down to already strapped local governments.

Their refusal to admit the existence of a looming statewide maintenance crisis threatens the economic health of huge geographic areas of the commonwealth and of hundreds of thousands of their fellow Virginians.

Their lack of political courage and plain common sense is just appalling. And the Old Dominion is going to pay a high price for it.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( avillage ) on July 22, 2008 at 11:30 am

rduckham, planners have known for years that we can’t road build our way out of traffic problems. If we don’t keep conceding to sprawl by constantly building new roads and upgrading roads created by sprawl to begin with, some day it will come to rest.

Big box retailers are not going to build where they know roads aren’t going to be. Their experience is, now, build and the roads come immediately. Stop the behavior and results change.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( avillage ) on July 22, 2008 at 9:47 am

dblu2, I encourage you to check your figures about North Carolina and Virginia. The VA and NC budgets are divided into general and non-general funds. The NC budget you refer to as $21B expenditure is general funds only and the VA budget figure you use (which I think should be $73.5B) is the combined general and non-general funds. The legislature has most control over the general funds.

If you want to compare apples to apples, lets compare general funds only. The VA general fund revenue for 2008-2010 is $33.29 for two years or over $16.5B per year. And, the VA budget is balanced by state law. The NC proposed expenses for FY 2008-2009, one year only, is $21.5B. Thus, NC actually spends more than Virginia at least in general budget.

Please check your numbers more carefully. I believe your premise is wrong. If so, your numbers serve to confuse people and facts.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( rduckham ) on July 22, 2008 at 8:51 am

I am afraid avillage that you are wrong, the strip centers, the big box retailers and the McMansions will be built with or without the highway infrastructure being available for them.  All it means is that current roads; which can’t handle the current load, will have thousands of n new cars thrust upon them.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( dblu2 ) on July 21, 2008 at 1:47 pm

Governor Kaine sought to bleep the two industries in this state that can least afford to have even more business taken away from them. Ironically, they are also the two industries his tree-hugger friends hate the most. That is where the fault lies.

The GOP did the absolute right thing. NO NEW TAXES!!! And vote out anyone who votes for new taxes! This state doesn’t have a revenue problem—it has a spending problem. When you have a $80 billion budget and your border state to the south has a $21 billion budget, you have plenty of money!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( avillage ) on July 21, 2008 at 11:45 am

Wow. I wonder if the current budget shortfall in the state has anything to do with a dramatic unforeseen slowdown in the economy due to dishonest practices in the housing market and the resulting credit crunch. Oil prices are in there also playing a big part. I suspect that Kaine had nothing to do with either of these; it is his and the General Assembly’s response to them that is important.

VDOT has had eight different audits in the past eight years. If it is so wasteful, has it shown up and are corrective actions being taken.

I want my taxes low, too. The question is, are the services we are getting worth the money we are spending. What do we want out of government? What basic services? While I’m also a proponent of localities payment for their own services as much as possible, I’m aware that transportation in urban areas definately influences the transporation of goods and services to non-urban areas. If so, is it fair to fully demand that NOVA totally pay for its own transporation problems?

Lynchburg has much to spend on CSO issues, a good thing because the upgrade takes pollution out of our waters. We get a state share to support the upgrade. How would it be for our water and sewer bills if the state said, “its your problem, you pay.” Another $4M out of the pockets of Lynchburg tax payers.  Would that be fair, especially when our water affects everyone else.

We do not live in isolation here. I don’t blame Tim Kaine for the shortfall. I do blame those elements of a blocked General Assembly for angry political rhetoric. I applaud GA members for taking principled stands and I am not naive enough to believe their stand is all about principles.

One good thing...no roads, no more sprawl.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( CKJ ) on July 20, 2008 at 10:13 pm

Kaine’s plan failed 98-0. Not even one Democrat voted for it.
Whoever wrote this article did not include their name. I wonder why?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Lone Gunman ) on July 20, 2008 at 6:07 pm

To Oldman66, I’ll have to agree!  Everything written in that article seems to be straight from the Democrats talking points hand book.  They just don’t like it when someone stands up to them is all.

I have a friend that works for VDOT and he tells me that there is more money wasted there on useless crap than you can shake a stick at!!  Looks like it’s time for someone else to run the show, since all Kaine seems to be able to do is kill bipartisan gun legislation that passed both houses and raise taxes and fees at all levels, in typical Democrat fashion!  I believe they call it “Tax and Spend” isn’t it?  It’s what they are best at!

And don’t get me started on Jim Webb.  That low life pledged to uphold the 2nd ammendment in his campaign but when HR2640 came around he sold us out, along with the rights of our brave service men and women!

Nah, I’ve seen enough of this bunch!  Time for another “change” in the state and I don’t mean a Democrat one either!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( m.paul.valois ) on July 20, 2008 at 7:21 am

There is no transportation problem in Lynchburg, despite the broken-record, Chicken Little screeching of this newspaper.

I’d like to see a responsible editor just once explain in detail precisely why the News & Advance believes that area residents would benefit from being taxed to build roads in Tidewater and Northern Virginia.

I suspect that at least one editor has a political axe to grind.  He knows that Tim Kaine’s political future could very well depend on delivering promised transportation funds to Northern Virginia and this particular editor would rather see Lynchburg residents pay through the nose than see Kaine fall flat on his face.

Furthering Tim Kaine’s political career does not justify raising taxes on our citizens.  Lynchburg residents have no interest in paying for roads elsewhere. Period.

What will it take for our newspaper to understand this?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on July 20, 2008 at 5:42 am

AND, they will vote the bums RIGHT BACK INTO OFFICE!  The old saying is true.  People get exactly the kind of government they deserve.  Who cares about transportation.  Gay marriage and abortion are the REAL important issues here in the Commonwealth and don’t you forget it.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( oldman66 ) on July 20, 2008 at 4:25 am

No question about it - this article took another opportunity to “slam” a native son - Jim Gilmore and could easily be attributed to having been written by a liberal democratic strategist. The writer seems to be about as aware of the money crunch facing taxpayers as does current political leaders at local, state, and federal levels. Tax money is being squandered at all levels. Could it be that Kaine’s predessor didn’t leave the coffers as well off as he likes to profess - that of being one of the best managed states in the Nation? I venture to question why Kaine, after being in office slightly over 2 1/2, has raised the user fee for virtually every service offered by the state in an effort to curtail his “budget-short fall”. Voters should begin putting some credence in electing native sons/daughters to our office at all levels. We can ill-afford the out-of-state “tax and spend liberals”. Three come readily to mind - Jim Webb, Mark Warner, and Tim Kaine.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement