Disappointing News on State Water Quality

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

The News & Advance
Published: August 18, 2008

When the state Department of Environmental Quality issued a report on the water quality of Virginia’s rivers and streams 12 years ago, slightly more than 2,000 miles of waterways were deemed impaired. That means the waterway failed to meet Virginia’s clean water standards.

Sadly, the water quality in those rivers and streams is not getting any better.

A report the environmental agency is scheduled to release this fall will show that Virginia’s 51,000 miles of rivers and streams may be getting dirtier. More than 10,600 miles of waterways were listed as “impaired” between Jan. 1, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2006, according to the report. That marks an 18 percent rise in impaired waters over the report issued two years earlier.

As The Daily Progress in Charlottesville reported last week, the state report is published every two years and is the state’s most comprehensive look at the health of Virginia’s waterways. The latest report shows an alarming trend toward poorer water quality, but some of that increase may be attributed to more widespread monitoring.

So who or what is responsible for fouling more miles of the rivers and streams that run from the mountains in the west to watersheds that empty into the Chesapeake Bay?

Higher levels of E. coli bacteria seem to head the list of ingredients making the waterways more unhealthy. And that bacteria is coming primarily from farm operations. It also mentions urban runoff, leaking sewers, failing septic tanks, domestic animals and wildlife as contributing factors.

Portions of the James River near Lynchburg have been listed as impaired in the past, partly as a result of the runoff from the city’s antiquated sewer system that allows storm water overflows to combine with raw sewage that flows into the river during heavy rainfalls. The combined sewer overflow project that has been in the works for a decade or more at a cost of millions will correct that when it is finished.

Population growth around the state has created the need for more housing and roads. Those houses — and apartment complexes — put stress on surrounding streams that often lead to lower quality water flowing through them.

Many of the state’s waterways are monitored by volunteers under a program coordinated by the DEQ. Those water monitors take samples from their local waterways, testing for temperature, pH, nutrients such as phosphorous, ammonia and nitrogen, and bacteria such as E. coli.

The state government only monitors about a third of Virginia’s waterways. The volunteers help keep an eye on much of the balance of them, which helps expand the state’s monitoring network.

The more widespread monitoring provided by volunteers accounts in part for the greater percentage of impaired waters. But the state and the General Assembly, which appropriates money for the monitoring efforts, should view the results of the water quality tests with concern.

Poll after poll has said that Virginians consider their environment — and the water quality that is part of it — important. Keeping a vigilant eye on the waterways will ensure, one would hope, that they don’t become any dirtier.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( oldman66 ) on August 19, 2008 at 2:52 pm

Hey Folks - The “illustrious” Tim Kaine appointed Benedict Arnold - correction - Preston Bryant as head of the DEQ. No doubt as a return favor for his vote on the biggest tax increase in state history during the Mark Warner reign as governor. No where in this article is Bryant’s name mentioned. Wharever happened to “accountability”?

More recently sludge was spread on over 100 acres of farm land in Campbell County and all the while the “powers-to-be” stood idly by and let it happen. More polution for the streams and environment. Timmy Kaine is a proponent of the use of biosolids as a fertilizer. Best managed state indeed!!

Thought should be given to the various industries located on/near the James, Staunton, Falling Rivers and streams in general. per se - Klopman & Burlington long gone to foreign countries to set up shop. What part did they play in the polution of area waterways?

You liberals keep electing these inept maniacs - everything will get better.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on August 19, 2008 at 10:27 am

I noticed that nothing was said about manufacturing facilities on these rivers. A rather glaring omission I would say. All the contamination is not coming from farms and septic systems.
A lot must be done. It will cost money.
Oh well, so much for that.
Virginia, the “Can’t Do” state.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on August 19, 2008 at 9:44 am

Of course you are right (coffeeroad)... but it doesn’t matter.  People will not pay taxes on property they can not develop or live on.  Of course the dollar always wins!  Isn’t that how America measures success?  Do you propose some form of totalitarian communist government that dictates all of our actions?  Just imagine another 40,000,000 unwanted people polluting the environment if abortion were illegal.  Of course it’s all lip service!  It will remain ALL lip service until or unless more money can be made doing things a different way.  That is why I posed the question…“What does watching something happen have to do with STOPPING it from happening in the first place?“  This article is about as informative as the guy who jumped off the 50 story building when he was heard to say, as he passed the 20th floor… “So far, so good.“

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( David McLoughlin ) on August 19, 2008 at 7:47 am

Icommend the paper for its recent series on the water issue. Today’s editorial continues in that same vein. I believe this is one of the really important jobs of the paper(to inform the public on vital issues) and I, for one, thank you for it.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( coffeeroad ) on August 19, 2008 at 7:19 am

Place a pig on an acre lot and you have a happy environment for a pig. Put 200 on the same lot and you have an environmental disaster. As long as local governments allow unfettered development, especially along shorelines and riparian areas, people will produce the same scenario described above. Polllution in Smith Mountain Lake, the James, the Chesapeake or in about any body of water on the East Coast is the natural byproduct of too many humans crowding too scare a resource. Connection with the land is lost, in their zeal for a tax dollar, local governments allow building on every existing lot in their jurisdictions, disregarding the fact that building on steep terrain, destroying of wetlands,and bulldozing farm fields into mud are only hastening the process. Everyone pays lip service to conservation, but in the end, the dollar always wins.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( VAWaterman ) on August 19, 2008 at 5:09 am

I love to read articles concerning water quality in the state’s western papers.
Article 11 of our state constitution allows for our natural resources to be constitutionally protected.
The Secretary of Natural Resources, Preston Bryant, lives right there in Lynchburg.
Public awareness stopped many from smoking. The Department of Natural Resources needs to start an awareness campaign but I don’t think that will ever happen.
Why?
Because it might show how poorly they are doing their job.
Since 1983 this problem has been known and pledges have been made to correct them.
25 years later the problem is worse and gets worse every year.
Where has all of this pollution ended up?
Right here in my back door, the Chesapeake Bay.
Last year 40% of the Bay was a dead zone and only 12% of the Bay meet the water quality standards. Yet the grade given for the Bay was a D+.
I wish I could have told my Mama that a 12 was a D+ but I would do better next time and bring home a 35.
One thing (among many) that irritate me is that VMRC, an agency of Natural Resources, doesn’t even include water quality into the equation while doing their so called fisheries management.
Why?
I don’t know but could it be because DEQ is also an agency of the Department of Natural Resources?
Ken Smith
President, Virginia Waterman’s Association
www.virginiawaterman.org/

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on August 19, 2008 at 5:01 am

..“Keeping a vigilant eye on the waterways will ensure, one would hope, that they don’t become any dirtier.“..  Why?  What does watching something happen have to do with STOPPING it from happening in the first place?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement