An Imperfect Road Plan Better Than No Plan At All

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

The News & Advance
Published: May 17, 2008

Transportation is a pressing statewide problem one governor after another and one General Assembly after another has ignored for the past two decades.

In 1986, then-Gov. Gerald Baliles pushed several tax proposals through the General Assembly, including a hike in the gas tax and an increase in the sales tax with the money going to transportation. After that, Richmond acted as though the problem had been addressed for all time. Politicians stuck their collective heads in the sand and, from the mid-1990s on, ignored signs of burgeoning problems in Northern Virginia and Tidewater.

At high noon this past Monday in Richmond, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine unveiled a series of tax increases and fee hikes that would provide about $1.1 billion a year exclusively for the commonwealth’s transportation highway and mass transit needs.

Just minutes after the Democratic governor took the wraps off his proposal, the king of the Republican anti-tax crowd calling the shots in the House of Delegates, Majority Leader Morgan Griffith of Salem, rejected it out of hand as just “tax, tax and more tax.”

Well, excuse us, Mr. Majority Leader, but how else is government supposed to pay the bills and provide the services the public expects and legislators mandate? By plucking money off trees?

Here’s a recap of the governor’s proposed tax and fee changes, and thanks to The Associated Press, how they would impact the average citizen:

* The titling tax on auto purchases rises from 3 percent to 4 percent, generating up to $212 million a year by 2014. The money goes solely to upkeep and repairs on the 58,000 miles of highways in Virginia. When you buy a $20,000, you’ll pay an additional $200.

* The grantor’s tax, paid by people selling houses, increases from 10 cents per $100 of the deal to 25 cents per $100, with the $155 million generated annually by 2015 funding rail and mass transit projects. The impact? A homeseller pays an additional $500 at closing on the sale of a $200,000 house.

* Renewing your motor vehicle would cost $10 more, rising from $39.50 to $49.50. The $73 million in annual proceeds by 2014 goes entirely to highway maintenance.

* The two regions with the greatest needs — Northern Virginia and Tidewater — would have the sales tax increased from 5 cents to 6 cents, exclusive of groceries and medicines. The regions would realize an additional $641 million by 2014 for new construction and priority projects. The cost? An additional $32 in tax on a $3,200 flat-screen, HD TV.

And this is what has the tax-hating wing of the House GOP seeing red and frothing at the mouth? Give us a break.

Last year, Griffith and his allies in the House cobbled together a transportation “plan” based on money raised by the horrific abusive driver fees and that transferred the burden of addressing Northern Virginia and Tidewater needs to unelected taxing authorities in those regions. The Virginia Supreme Court killed that idea earlier this year, declaring such bodies “patently unconstitutional.”

Del. Griffith and his minions in the House simply do not want to admit that a statewide problem exists, because that means they would have to shoulder part of the blame. They simply want to resurrect the regional taxes and fees from a year ago, to be implemented by local city councils and boards of supervisors instead of unelected authorities. In other words, just another unfunded mandate from Richmond.

Talk about gall. Talk about buck-passing.

A modern, well-maintained transportation system is a statewide need and a statewide priority. Residents of Forest or Rustburg have as much interest in seeing good roads in Fairfax as the residents of Northern Virginia. A widened and improved U.S. 221 in Forest is as important to residents of Hampton Roads as it is to residents of Bedford County.

What the House majority leader’s approach amounts to is nothing less than balkanization of the commonwealth. Northern Virginia, Tidewater: We’ll give you “privilege” of taxing yourself to pay for transportation needs; the rest of the state: We just don’t see as there’s a statewide need here at all.

The commonwealth’s future economic health and vitality depend on a statewide transportation solution. Gov. Kaine’s plan, while not perfect, is head-and-shoulders above anything the anti-tax wing of the GOP is talking about, which is absolutely nothing.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( luv2bliberal ) on May 19, 2008 at 10:30 am

Cosmo,

You are such an educated intellectual I was wondering.  Have you ever “worked” in life or accomplished anything of any meaningful significance with that education?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Accountability Fan ) on May 18, 2008 at 6:18 pm

“ but how else is government supposed to pay the bills and provide the services the public expects and legislators mandate? By plucking money off trees?”

Well how in the world are those that don’t feed at the “government trough” suppose to get this non-discretionary funding...print it in the basement?

The N & A has never met a tax it didn’t like.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( m.paul.valois ) on May 18, 2008 at 8:21 am

Why is it that Republicans are routinely described by this irresponsible newspaper as “tax-hating” but Democrats are never described as “tax-loving”?

Why did the editors neglect to mention that that the evil “plan” that was supposedly “cobbled together” by a nefarious Republican and his blackhearted minions was in fact signed into law by none other than our Democratic governor?

Do you think that there just might be a little bias afoot at our local paper? A tad, maybe?  You think? 

It reads like Pravda, circa 1984.

The reality, as the editors are forced to note, is that in 1986, taxes were raised to throw money at transportation in order to fix it, and… it didn’t work.  Surprise, surprise!…

So the News $ Advance proposes to throw more tax money at the problem.

The justification for throwing good money after bad?  “Residents of Forest or Rustburg have as much interest in seeing good roads in Fairfax as the residents of Northern Virginia.”

This assertion, regurgitated reflexively by the editors at regular intervals, that local residents have any substantial interest in the roads of Fairfax is as silly as it is Marxist.  A simple poll would refute this idiocy in about three minutes.  Common sense will dispatch the stupid notion even faster.

Throwing money at road construction doesn’t help anything; indeed it hurts.  It encourages “white flight” by drawing developers and middle class families to the exurbs and contributes to the demise of downtowns across the state.  It encourages needless consumption of gasoline (and if you toe the politically correct line, it also thereby contributes to global warming and the “war for oil").  It takes huge amounts of time away from employers and families in hours lost to commuting. Most importantly, expanding roads adds millions of dollars to the annual maintnenance and operations budgets.

Let the developers pay for the new roads if they want them.  Leave the taxpayers alone.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 18, 2008 at 7:38 am

I agree, but only to a point.  Our energy future will little resemble the past.  The days of cheap gas are over.  The idea of “planning” our transportation future on our past is absurd.  ONLY considering highways as our transportation needs is absurd.  Since we can never depend upon our “leaders” to lead the citizens themselves must simply do better than relying on THEM.  The days of one car per person are becoming untenable, as are long commutes.  By ignoring mass transportation needs and future realities along those lines we condemn ourselves to a bleak future.  ONLY considering the improvement of roads is as sensible as providing comfy pillows for the deck chairs on the Titanic.  With or without them, we are going down.  Do I expect any sensible action from government or our citizens in Virginia?  NO!  We are far to enamored with anti-intellectualism and excited about “The Rapture” to ever sustain a clear though for long.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( damalama ) on May 18, 2008 at 2:29 am

just how do these people think we are going to pay for the road improvements that are needed in northern va and everywhere else in this state.  they had a brillant plan of fining abusive drivers out on the roads, the law was to broad but it would have been great, if it just fined the DUIs, Reckless by Speeds, and Suspended/Revoked/No License drivers out there.  but no the voice of the minority the law breaking citizens were louder than everyone else that though it was a good idea, contacting higher ups because they can’t drive the speed limit.  so now the end result is higer taxes for all!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement