Teen guilty of improper driving in 2-year-old’s death

Omarion Rose, 2, died Jan. 14.

Teen guilty of improper driving in 2-year-old’s death

Omarion Rose, 2, died Jan. 14.

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Chris Dumond

Published: July 1, 2008

AMHERST — A Madison Heights teen was found guilty of improper driving Tuesday in connection with the Jan. 14 death of a toddler. She was fined $500 and will not go to jail.

According to testimony in the trial, Kaylie Silby was driving on Seminole Drive that morning near Omarion Rose’s Branch Drive home when her cell phone rang.

“I had to take my eyes off the road … I felt a bump,” Silby testified. “I did not think to think it was a two-year-old child.”

The 18-year-old testified in Amherst County General District during a tense and emotional trial that lasted more than three hours before a packed courtroom. She cried throughout the proceedings; so did Omarion Rose’s mother.

Silby, 18, said she had a good view of the road before her phone rang, and it was clear when she looked over to grab the phone. After feeling the car hit something, she said, she checked her mirrors and saw nothing.

Eva Martin testified she saw the boy on the side of the road around 8:30 that morning. When she stopped, her husband, who first thought it was a doll, told her to call 911.

The child later died at UVa medical center.

It wasn’t until Silby saw a commercial for the evening news later that day about the investigation that she realized she could have hit the child, Virginia State Police Special Agent Michael Bryant testified.

Bryant interviewed Silby after her mother’s boyfriend called police to tell them Silby was worried she might have hit the boy.

“She told me she thought it was a pothole, at worst a dog,” Bryant testified.

He also testified her cell phone records backed up her story and that her boyfriend called her around 8:23 a.m., around the time police believe the toddler was hit.

Dr. William Gormley, assistant chief medical examiner for the state forensics office in Richmond, testified an autopsy showed the boy likely was struck once and not hit by more than one car.

Investigators also were able to match pieces of plastic found near the boy to Silby’s turn signal.

Judge Edwin Burnette found Silby not guilty of reckless driving, the original charge.

Burnette said he believed Silby did strike Rose, causing his death. But reaching for a cell phone, he said, “is not illegal, but it may be imprudent.”

The judge acknowledged that his ruling and the subsequent maximum penalty, a $500 fine, may seem inadequate to many, but said he hoped it would make others think twice before taking their eyes off the road to answer a phone.

Silby did not exit the courtroom or the courthouse through a public entrance and was not available for comment.

“It was a bad situation,” her mother, Belinda Silby, said before leaving.

Katrina Jennings, Rose’s godmother, said she was angry after the trial because Silby did not apologize or say she was sorry.

Jennings said the family was happy with the job Commonwealth’s Attorney Stephanie Maddox did in presenting the case.

“A life is gone, though,” she said. “You can never bring it back.”

Prosecutors earlier said reckless driving, a misdemeanor carrying as much as a year in jail, was the strongest charge they could bring against Silby because there was not enough evidence to prove she knew she had hit the boy.

Maddox said the family was obviously upset by the outcome.

“This is just a tragic case all the way around,” she said. “We respect the judge’s decision.”

While state police investigators and her staff put in many hours preparing for the trial, she said she always knew the improper driving ruling was a possibility.

“It came down to driver inattention,” she said. “The judge equated that with reaching for a cup of coffee and reaching for a cell phone is not illegal.”

Legislative proposals concerning the use of cell phones were hot issues in the 2007 General Assembly. Ultimately, though, the bill did not pass.

Maddox said she will do her part to use Rose’s death as a case study for why such legislation is needed.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( ceecee ) on July 02, 2008 at 9:19 am

What a shame| What happened to simple compassion? I remember the day when you struck an animal you would stop to try to notify the owner or get assistance for the animal. Yes, the child was not with a responsible person, but has never taken their eyes off of a child to find that the child was gone if only momentarily? Trying to blame the parents is being too insensitive. Why wasn’t she charged with vechicular homicide?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( I_have_an_opinion ) on July 02, 2008 at 8:17 am

The judge sent a loud and clear message: Drivers are not responsible for their actions (or limited to $500), even when common sense is tossed aside and you divert all your attention to a phone in a car.  Does this fall under the definition of reckless driving?
[(1) drive at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger life, limb, or property of another; or (2) that the driver disregarded the consequences of his actions and displayed an indifference to the safety of life, limb, or property.  The action must be intentional on the part of the driver.]

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( amy ) on July 01, 2008 at 10:30 pm

OUTRAGEOUS! What the judge said about punishing her for reaching for her phone MAKES NO SENSE! You get punished for the taking of a life, not taking a cell phone call!
I still say, if the boy had been white, this would be a different story!
How about some community service for the girl? The judge really thinks a $500 fine will make people think twice before answering their phone???

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( letstalk ) on July 01, 2008 at 9:21 pm

This was a tragic accident.
The young lady came forward.
The courts have rendered their decision.
Everyone needs to move on.
We all need to remember that this child was not being watched and got out of the house. If he was under proper supervision we would not be having to discuss this matter. As reports go. I am sure the family now will file a civil suit and put $$ on this childs life, when they are partly the blame for what happened here.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bkcmome ) on July 01, 2008 at 4:01 pm

This is outrageous she thought she hit a dog but didn’t stop to look??? Much worst she hits and kills a beautiful baby. I do not know this family but I can tell you I am a mother and I am outraged that a judge could be so easy on someone for taking a life. I guess its not who ya know its who ya @@@@.. My thoughts continue to stay with Omarion’s family. I do feel however that the person in charge of watching Omarion should be charges as well but Kaylie was charged with a driving offense how right is that what is our world coming too

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( fishfinder ) on July 01, 2008 at 3:11 pm

What a shame.  The “Brotherhood will look after Brotherhood”.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement