Lynchburg teen accused of shooting cheerleader faces new charges
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Chris Dumond
Published: December 2, 2008
A Lynchburg teenager accused of wounding an E.C. Glass cheerleader in a drive-by shooting this summer has been indicted on new charges that an adult was also shot.
Michael Ward, 17, was indicted Monday on charges of shooting from a vehicle, shooting an occupied dwelling, use of a firearm in commission of a felony and the malicious wounding of 17-year-old Kymberlee Moore.
An earlier charge of possession of a firearm was upgraded to possession of a firearm by a convicted violent felon in the indictment, Senior Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Janell Johnson said.
Johnson said Ward was directly indicted on another charge of use of firearm in commission of a felony and the malicious wounding of Payton Taylor, an adult male who was also shot in the July 28 incident.
The prosecutor said she couldn’t release any more information about Taylor’s injuries or the new charges since they haven’t been heard in court.
According to testimony at Ward’s preliminary hearing last month, Moore and several relatives and friends were gathered on the porch of her grandmother’s Pierce Street home the afternoon of the shooting when Ward’s sister got into a fight with another girl.
The girl left, Moore’s aunt testified, but promised she’d be back. Fifteen minutes later, she said, a car turned onto the street from 11th Street with Ward leaning out the window, shooting at the dozen or so people gathered.
Moore was shot in the back, but has since recovered except for the scar, her mother testified.
Ward is jailed at the Lynchburg Adult Detention Center pending trial, which is scheduled for Feb. 23.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Mike ) on December 08, 2008 at 7:12 pm
Hmm, I’m not sure why they upgraded his charge from possession to possession by a convicted felon.
If he’s a convicted felon (at 17) why was he on the street in the first place, and why didn’t they charge him with possession by a felon immediately? If he wasn’t a felon, then how can they upgrade the charges retroactively to include his felon status if he hasn’t been convicted yet from the first incident?
Personally I’m for criminals being publicly caned and otherwise humiliated. A little mockery goes a long ways. Might make little Johnny think twice next time. But then again, that would be cruel - unlike shooting someone of course….
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( crispy daisy ) on December 06, 2008 at 12:49 pm
Noobs need to be broken in gently.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on December 06, 2008 at 11:20 am
Oh (Crispy)...
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( crispy daisy ) on December 06, 2008 at 9:25 am
redsman, cosmo was being sarcastic.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( redsman ) on December 06, 2008 at 6:16 am
Not too strict? are you an idiot? He shot somebody in a drive by! He was too much of a wimp to even face the person he shot.
let him fry!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on December 05, 2008 at 6:33 pm
I sure hope they are not too strict with this young man. A high level of self esteem is so important for today’s young people.
Report Inappropriate Comment