Liberty University officials criticize ‘Evangelical Manifesto’

Liberty University officials criticize ‘Evangelical Manifesto’

Ergun Caner, president of the Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, said the manifesto is “like coming out to a Pittsburgh Steelers game wearing a Cleveland Browns jersey. It’s a document that has great intentions but will never happen.”

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Justin Faulconer

Published: May 21, 2008

It’s a document that a group of Christian leaders hope can rally evangelicals and ease political polarization.

But Liberty University officials feel parts of a recently released, 20-page “Evangelical Manifesto” undercuts the political activism and voice in modern culture that founder Jerry Falwell spent his life advocating.

A committee of nine pastors, seminary deans and writers from across the country released the manifesto earlier this month. Its intent is to reaffirm, and redefine, evangelicals’ identity and public involvement.

“That word evangelical has taken on increasingly political connections,” said David Neff, editor-in-chief of Christianity Today and a committee member. “That’s not what we’re about. Our identity is promoting faith in Jesus Christ and all that goes with that.”

A section that has drawn particular ire from Liberty officials states that neither the religious right nor religious left should “politicize faith.” In that case, Christians become “useful idiots” for one political party or another, it states, and beliefs become weapons for political interests.

Ergun Caner, president of the Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, said the manifesto “muddies the water” when it comes to being an evangelical.

Caner, a former Muslim who converted in 1982, defines the term as “pro-life, pro-family” and having solely Christian beliefs.

“To me, it’s like coming out to a Pittsburgh Steelers game wearing a Cleveland Browns jersey,” Caner said of the manifesto. “It’s a document that has great intentions but will never happen.”

Caner said he wasn’t happy to learn his name was listed as a charter signatory to the manifesto when it was unveiled May 7 in Washington D.C. The committee contacted him to review the document’s language, he said, but he never gave consent to include his signature.

Neff said it was an oversight that Caner’s name had been included and it has since been removed.

Caner said Falwell was also listed as having signed it, though Neff said he was not aware of that and the manifesto’s Web site does not list Falwell as a signatory.

Jerry Falwell Jr., chancellor of Liberty University, said his father would never sign anything that would discourage political involvement.

“Anyone who knew Dad knew that’s not what he believed,” Falwell said.

The manifesto, which Neff admits is a self-critical look at evangelicals, stresses reforming behavior and pushing for more denominational unity.

Neff said there also must be a different approach in engaging in the public square, like trying to decrease political polarization.

“We don’t feel like it’s our task to further that polarization,” Neff said. “If anything, we should bridge people.”

The manifesto also calls for a need to go beyond “single-issue” politics such as abortion and marriage to fight against racism, corruption, poverty and illiteracy.

Caner said he does not disagree with the manifesto as a whole, but called the section addressing political activism “spineless” and a “group hug approach to Christianity.”

He said in a written statement that he does not apologize for stances the university has taken for decades.

“We believe Christianity has been pushed out of the public square,” Caner wrote. “We are not owned by any political party, but we will stand with and for candidates that are for our values and against those values that we see as unbiblical.”

Neff said reaction to the manifesto so far has been “mixed.” There was no intent, he said, to impact the upcoming presidential election by swaying evangelical voters who played a part in electing President Bush to two terms.

Falwell said there always have been people in both parties who call themselves evangelicals, but the turnout in recent elections for the pro-life, pro-family candidate has been reassuring.

He said he predicts the same kind of turnout in this year’s election.

“It’s a little harder for evangelicals to get excited about John McCain than it was for Bush,” Falwell said. “But when it comes to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, he’s better than the given alternatives.”

Neff said the evangelical term has been around for centuries, but was revived in the 1940s by the ministry of Billy Graham. He personally defines an evangelical as someone who has converted, has Christian and Bible-centered beliefs and participates in social activism based on compassion.

Nearly 29 percent of the United States population consider themselves evangelical, according to the 2007 Statistical Abstract of the United States, a publication of the Census Bureau.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( caribbeanevangelical ) on May 22, 2008 at 10:03 am

As someone born and living in the Global South it has been refreshing hearing North American Evangelical Christians espouse biblical positions in the Manifesto so much closer to those we espouse than the extremist, fringe positions taken by persons who have been headlined by the media as representatives of the Evangelical Movement. Not only do perons like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson not represent Evangelical biblical beliefs but the extremeism they project has harmed Evangelicals in the Global South in numerous ways, one of which is having all Evangelicals everywhere tarnished and stereotyped as simple, extremist and untrue to Scripture. Thank God for men courageous enough to publish the Manifesto. It is like a breath of fresh air to those of us who live outside the USA.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Anonymous ) on May 22, 2008 at 10:00 am

“How in the world can people keep on letting this ship of fools continue to sail-on without challenge?“

Good call, VoiceOfReason. How can we as a people “let” these nuts carry on? As both a community and a nation we should do something about these religious nuts. They’re trying to take over our city and our country. They’re the cause of all our ills. They’re mentally defective and we shouldn’t have to deal with them.

Perhaps we should just round them all up and put them into camps of some sort. You know, camps that could concentrate their crazy ways into certain areas we deem appropriate. It’d be a bear to pay for but hey, we could probably even squeeze some work out of them while they’re there! They’re obviously not worth the space they’re taking up, so why not?

That’ll learn ‘em for thinking so illogically.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on May 22, 2008 at 9:28 am

Political influence and the money it generates is what built LU.
I think LU and TRBC and all of their so-called ministries should continue their habits of political activism.
Of course, I don’t think they should try to have it both ways. They should renounce their tax-exempt status since they don’t recognize the separation of church and state except when it is to their benefit.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( FedUpWithTRBC ) on May 22, 2008 at 8:14 am

Oh come on Ergun Cancer, tell it like it is! TRBC has NO interest in spreading the word of God or the teachings of Christ. IT’S ALL ABOUT MONEY AND POWER! Jesus represents love, compassion, forgiveness, tolerance, generosity, hope, caring, charity and all other warm and fuzzy attributes.  TRBC stands for intolerance, greed, domination, fear, separatism, manipulation and all other attributes that would make the devil himself feel all warm and fuzzy. How in the world can people keep on letting this ship of fools continue to sail-on without challenge? Is this the kind of organization that our city council really wants as a representation of our city? Is this that kind of hypocrisy we want ruling Lynchburg? This is the kind of response and resistance you can expect from TRBC/LU when the truly moral Christians get together and try to do the right thing. TRBC/LU is a disgrace to Christianity and Humanity.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement