Liberty University officials criticize ‘Evangelical Manifesto’

Liberty University officials criticize ‘Evangelical Manifesto’

Ergun Caner, president of the Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, said the manifesto is “like coming out to a Pittsburgh Steelers game wearing a Cleveland Browns jersey. It’s a document that has great intentions but will never happen.”

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Justin Faulconer

Published: May 21, 2008

It’s a document that a group of Christian leaders hope can rally evangelicals and ease political polarization.

But Liberty University officials feel parts of a recently released, 20-page “Evangelical Manifesto” undercuts the political activism and voice in modern culture that founder Jerry Falwell spent his life advocating.

A committee of nine pastors, seminary deans and writers from across the country released the manifesto earlier this month. Its intent is to reaffirm, and redefine, evangelicals’ identity and public involvement.

“That word evangelical has taken on increasingly political connections,” said David Neff, editor-in-chief of Christianity Today and a committee member. “That’s not what we’re about. Our identity is promoting faith in Jesus Christ and all that goes with that.”

A section that has drawn particular ire from Liberty officials states that neither the religious right nor religious left should “politicize faith.” In that case, Christians become “useful idiots” for one political party or another, it states, and beliefs become weapons for political interests.

Ergun Caner, president of the Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, said the manifesto “muddies the water” when it comes to being an evangelical.

Caner, a former Muslim who converted in 1982, defines the term as “pro-life, pro-family” and having solely Christian beliefs.

“To me, it’s like coming out to a Pittsburgh Steelers game wearing a Cleveland Browns jersey,” Caner said of the manifesto. “It’s a document that has great intentions but will never happen.”

Caner said he wasn’t happy to learn his name was listed as a charter signatory to the manifesto when it was unveiled May 7 in Washington D.C. The committee contacted him to review the document’s language, he said, but he never gave consent to include his signature.

Neff said it was an oversight that Caner’s name had been included and it has since been removed.

Caner said Falwell was also listed as having signed it, though Neff said he was not aware of that and the manifesto’s Web site does not list Falwell as a signatory.

Jerry Falwell Jr., chancellor of Liberty University, said his father would never sign anything that would discourage political involvement.

“Anyone who knew Dad knew that’s not what he believed,” Falwell said.

The manifesto, which Neff admits is a self-critical look at evangelicals, stresses reforming behavior and pushing for more denominational unity.

Neff said there also must be a different approach in engaging in the public square, like trying to decrease political polarization.

“We don’t feel like it’s our task to further that polarization,” Neff said. “If anything, we should bridge people.”

The manifesto also calls for a need to go beyond “single-issue” politics such as abortion and marriage to fight against racism, corruption, poverty and illiteracy.

Caner said he does not disagree with the manifesto as a whole, but called the section addressing political activism “spineless” and a “group hug approach to Christianity.”

He said in a written statement that he does not apologize for stances the university has taken for decades.

“We believe Christianity has been pushed out of the public square,” Caner wrote. “We are not owned by any political party, but we will stand with and for candidates that are for our values and against those values that we see as unbiblical.”

Neff said reaction to the manifesto so far has been “mixed.” There was no intent, he said, to impact the upcoming presidential election by swaying evangelical voters who played a part in electing President Bush to two terms.

Falwell said there always have been people in both parties who call themselves evangelicals, but the turnout in recent elections for the pro-life, pro-family candidate has been reassuring.

He said he predicts the same kind of turnout in this year’s election.

“It’s a little harder for evangelicals to get excited about John McCain than it was for Bush,” Falwell said. “But when it comes to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, he’s better than the given alternatives.”

Neff said the evangelical term has been around for centuries, but was revived in the 1940s by the ministry of Billy Graham. He personally defines an evangelical as someone who has converted, has Christian and Bible-centered beliefs and participates in social activism based on compassion.

Nearly 29 percent of the United States population consider themselves evangelical, according to the 2007 Statistical Abstract of the United States, a publication of the Census Bureau.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on June 07, 2008 at 9:57 pm

Alas, RealityCheck: you are sounding shrill. “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” . . . how juvenile.  If someone wants to remain anonymous on this board, so be it.  If someone wants to give his/her name, so be it.  And as I drop paint on the floor with one hand and type with the other, I remain, forever, JacksonPollock. 

With all due respect, your comment on “dogma” makes absolutely no sense.  Scientific theories (e.g., the theory of evolution) are not dogma since they do not hold to “absolute truths”, hence, the word “theory”; therefore, a person who doesn’t accept the theory of evolution cannot be declared a heretic since heresy exists only within groups (e.g., fundamentalist Christian) who believe in absolute truth.  Look it up.  Get educated, my friend.
Shalom.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Reality Check ) on June 06, 2008 at 10:48 pm

The most dogmatic people in the world these days seem to be the scientists who believe in evolution and global warming.  Question their dogma and you will be branded a heretic.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Reality Check ) on June 06, 2008 at 1:33 am

Little Cosmo was the first one to attack someone cowardly so he should have to reveal his name first.  If he reveals his, I will reveal mine.  Don’t hold your breath though.  Little weasels like him love to hide.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( JacksonPollock ) on June 04, 2008 at 6:37 pm

RealityCheck.  What a tool you are asking Cosmos to come forth with his name when YOU use a pseudonym yourself.  Cosmos can do what he wants regarding his name; I can challenge you to come forth with your name since you know me as JacksonPollock.

And it is great to see the churches moving away from Falwellian dogma except, of course, TRBC, which shall forever be the beacon of darkness, bigotry, intolerance and telling everyone what his/her values are, and then they vote based on that; so, yes, TRBC does tell everyone in the church for whom to vote.

And, jdrubeck, you might accuse me of being intolerant to the intolerant who are intolerant to the intolerant, but I think that you are being intolerant to the intolerant whom you accuse of being intolerant to the intolerant.  Do you follow me on that?  Peace.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Reality Check ) on June 03, 2008 at 11:12 pm

Come on, Cosmo WF, tell us your name.  You are not afraid, are you?  People like you can dish it out but you can’t take it.  It is much easier to hide behind an alias and call others con men, KKK members or Nazis than it is to engage in intellectual debate on the merits.  You reveal your stupidity when you open your mouth.  People like you are your own worst enemy.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on June 02, 2008 at 10:00 am

Way to go (Reality Check)!  Are you related to the Check family out on Timberlake?  I am sorry to disappoint you Reality, but, you will have to find someplace else to burn your cross.  Sorry.  I know it spoils all your fun.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Reality Check ) on June 01, 2008 at 11:33 pm

Cosmo Wafflefoot, you are a real tough man as long as you don’t have to use your real name.  I dare you to reveal your name, you coward!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 31, 2008 at 1:03 pm

Jerry Falwell was a con-man.  He practiced what he preached all right.  Bigotry, ignorance and discrimination against people who apposed his rackets.  The world is a much better place without him.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( LynchburgRes ) on May 31, 2008 at 11:22 am

The fact that main stream Christian thought is turning away from the “Liberty” and Falwell brainwashing really is the best news I’ve heard in years.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( PilgrimVP ) on May 31, 2008 at 10:18 am

Dr. Falwell was a great man.  He practiced what he preached.  Having recently been to Lynchburg, it is apparent he was loved and respected by his hometown.  Dr. Caner and Dr. Jerry Jr. are right on in their comments.  But what is greater is the spirit of love and compassion they manifest in daily life.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement