Amherst County custody death lawsuit alleges sheriff coverup
A judge previously dismissed Amherst Sheriff Jimmy Ayers (left) from the lawsuit. Ayers’ lawyer has denied the cover-up claims.
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Chris Dumond
Published: April 8, 2008
The mother of a man suffocated in the custody of Amherst County deputies has filed new claims that Sheriff Jimmy Ayers conspired with those deputies and the Virginia State Police to cover up her son’s 2005 slaying.
New allegations filed in the suit also claim Ayers tried to get doctors to reconsider the cause of death in the case, ruled by the Virginia Medical Examiner’s
Office as suffocation by police restraint, with cocaine abuse and heart disease listed as contributing factors. The state medical examiner who autopsied the man declined to answer questions about the accusation Tuesday.
The $15 million suit, filed by Melva Taylor Davis in U.S. District Court in Lynchburg, claims current and former Amherst County Sheriff’s Office employees
Debbie Tinnell, Daren Givens, Brian Drewry, D.K. Dodson, and Betty Wise used excessive force in the June 16, 2005, death of her son, Sanchez Jarkel Taylor.
The suit also alleges the deputies and the sheriff conspired to violate Taylor’s civil rights.
Carlene Johnson of Dillwyn, the lawyer representing the sheriff and deputies, has contended in court that Taylor, 28, fought with police in what was believed to have been a frustrated break-in attempt and the restraint that resulted in his suffocation was reasonable.
Ayers declined Tuesday to comment on the charges given the ongoing litigation.
U.S. District Court Judge Norman Moon ruled in January that the excessive force and initial conspiracy claim could go forward, but dismissed the sheriff from the lawsuit last month.
The most recent conspiracy claims, reasserting the sheriff’s role in an alleged cover-up, were filed in response.
In the new allegations, the dead man’s mother claims Ayers conspired with deputies and the Virginia State Police to conduct the homicide investigation in a way that would prevent a criminal prosecution.
Halifax Commonwealth’s Attorney Kim White was asked to handle the criminal investigation by Amherst County Commonwealth’s Attorney Stephanie Maddox due to a conflict of interest.
White has not made a formal determination on possible charges in the nearly three-year-old investigation.
Virginia State Police spokesman Sgt. David Cooper said the state investigation is complete and has been turned over to White. Cooper referred other questions in the matter to her.
White has refused for months to comment on the matter and did not return a call Tuesday.
She has also refused to open the state police investigation file to The News & Advance. Davis’ attorney, Arelia Langhorne of Lynchburg, has said White let her review the file before filing her lawsuit.
White has cited provisions in state law that allow the withholding of such information in the case of an ongoing police investigation.
However, the criminal investigation has long since concluded, according to repeated statements by the state police here and in Richmond.
Likewise, the sheriff’s department has also refused to release its files in the matter, citing an ongoing investigation. Langhorne, however, told the court in January that she was able to get information from a public records request.
In the area’s most recent police custody death, the September 2006 death of Clarence Beard in Lynchburg, city police released an investigative summary report. Lynchburg Commonwealth’s Attorney Michael Doucette published both a report on how he reached his decision not to prosecute and portions of a separate Virginia State Police investigation.
Beard’s death is also the subject of an ongoing wrongful death lawsuit in Lynchburg Circuit Court.
In the Taylor case, Dr. David Cresson, the doctor who signed the death certificate, said the accusations that the sheriff tried to persuade medical examiners to change Taylor’s cause of death were incorrect.
“No law enforcement has ever called me like that,” Cresson said. “That’s never happened to me. I’ve had family call and ask, but I think law enforcement knows better than to do that.”
The Lynchburg pathologist noted that he signs death certificates based on autopsy information from the state medical examiner’s office in Roanoke.
Dr. Gregory Wanger, who conducted the autopsy and who now works for Kentucky in a medical examiner’s office near Cincinnati, repeatedly refused Tuesday to say whether the sheriff ever tried to influence his findings.
“I don’t work for the state anymore and I don’t do their press releases for them,” Wanger said finally before hanging up. “There’s a file there and they can look at it and decide what to tell you.”
Tracie Cooper, the district administrator in Wanger’s former office, said she was not working in Roanoke at the time of the autopsy. Cooper said Wanger’s report did not include anything to indicate the sheriff asked for the cause of death to be changed.
The third new claim states that when the sheriff heard Taylor was about to die, he ordered an investigator to swear out an arrest warrant alleging the man was trying to break into the welding shop where he was killed, knowing that it would never be served and that the charge was baseless.
Taylor’s arrest warrant was issued at 7:18 p.m. the night of his death, six minutes before the time of death listed on his death certificate.
The final claim is that the sheriff asked deputies and a state trooper to tell Taylor’s mother that he died of a drug overdose.
The sheriff’s lawyer has denied the conspiracy claims in a new filing this month. Johnson stated that even if the allegations are true, a cover up would not have deprived Taylor of his civil rights.
The judge in the case has not ruled on the new allegations. A trial is scheduled for Sept. 15 through 19.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on April 11, 2008 at 12:41 pm
The N&A;didn’t do anything but report the allegations that will be heard in court. The guy is dead! I wasn’t there and neither were you. It would seem to me that all those cops with god knows how much tax payers money spent on their training SHOULD have been able to handle a guy who broke down on the highway and was looking for a phone. I don’t care what kind of person you are, the police DO NOT have a right to kill you first… and arrest you later! Use your head! The guy broke down. Do you think he said to himself… “Lets see, my car is stuck on RT. 29, I have no ride, sounds like a GREAT time to break into a welding shop.” “Ut-Oh, here come a bunch of cops, I can’t get away, so, guess I will put up such a fight that they will kill me.” Something is very fishy with this case alright.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( mad in lynchburg ) on April 11, 2008 at 11:29 am
Talk about conflict of interest. Stephanie Maddox and Kim White worked together in the Lynchburg Commonwealth’s Attorneys Office for years. How is bringing Kim White in NOT a conflict of ineterst?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( crispy daisy ) on April 10, 2008 at 11:18 am
damalama, this family may be greedy and just after a lot of money—I have no idea—but you can’t necessarily blame them for his drug addiction. I’ve known several people from loving, caring families who became addicted to drugs and/or alcohol, and all of the support and help in the world couldn’t get them to stop. Addiction isn’t necessarily caused by bad parenting. Some people are just susceptible to addiction. If you’ve never known a family that struggled with it, you’re pretty lucky. We’re burying a 50 year-old relative tomorrow who suffered from depression and became addicted to prescription drugs. Her parents did everything they could to help her—paid for counseling, for long-term rehab twice—but sometimes nothing works. It happens in the best of families, as well as in the worst.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( damalama ) on April 09, 2008 at 8:55 pm
the news and advance should be ashamed of themselves for publishing a news report with absolutely no facts to support the claims. just more wild allegations made by a family of a drug abuser and criminal that they didn’t care about enough to know what he was up to or to get him help, but now they care so much they want 15 million. i hope all cooperation from police departments dry up wit the news and advance since you are so eager to do an article that has no facts. can i write in a article for the news and advance filled with allegations that the family of this “man” were a horrible family, knew about his drug addiction, only care about money now, and didn’t get him help, etc. i don’t know if that is true, and neither does the news, but just like this story it didn’t matter they wrote the article anyways.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( damalama ) on April 09, 2008 at 4:21 pm
what a pathetic family this “man” grew up in. throwing around accusations that are baseless themselves. the facts are the facts he WAS breaking into a garage from the past story, and fought the police. the POOR parenting lead to his cocaine abuse, there is no one to blame but the parents for raising a criminal. now they love the child so much supposedly, or course they do all they see now is the money they can get out of it, and i bet that they would settle for a fraction of that lawsuit out of court and drop all charges cause all this family cares about is MONEY now. your son was a drug abusing criminal, that fought the police and got what he deserved, deal with it.
Report Inappropriate Comment