New suit filed against Bluffwalk Center’s developers

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Bryan Gentry

Published: June 6, 2008

An interior design firm that helped Bluffwalk Center in downtown Lynchburg is suing the hotel project’s developers.

Texas-based Lee Collections claims the developers owe them $83,500 for services, products and interest.

But Hal Craddock, managing partner in the Bluffwalk project, said Friday that some of those charges result from inflated shipping sales tax and other charges.

“Out of the literally hundreds of vendors and suppliers that we worked with over the past five years … every single one has treated us fairly and consistently with the exception of Lee Collections,” Craddock said.

Lynchburg lawyer Henry Devening filed suit for Lee Collections on May 30 in Lynchburg Circuit Court.

“I frankly am hopeful that Bluffwalk will survive and do well, but they’ve left us no choice,” Devening said.

According to the lawsuit, the developers contacted Lee Collections in December 2006.

They asked the company to help design and buy interior furnishings, “including window treatments, furniture and related accessories,” the suit says.

The contract was verbal, but the parties never put the agreement in writing, Devening said.

The total cost of Lee Collections’ work — including a $24,000 design fee, furniture costs, shipping charges, and sales tax — was $153,782.

Craddock said the Bluffwalk developers noticed the shipping cost charged by Lee Collections was more than the actual costs reported by the shipping company.

After scrutinizing other charges, they found markup in sales tax charges and in the charges for the furniture itself.

“That’s the reason we haven’t paid them,” Craddock said.

According to the suit, the developers have paid $18,000 of the design fee and $79,632.75 toward other costs.

Lee Collections is asking for the remaining $74,150 plus $9,400 to cover paying its suppliers for the hotel’s furniture.

Craddock said the developers have documented their concerns in writing to Lee Collections, and have made an offer to pay what they think is fair.

“We’re prepared to defend it,” he said. “We think we’ll be successful.”

The Craddock-Terry Hotel and Event Center consists of two renovated buildings in downtown Lynchburg. The center opened in September with more than $1 million of public money involved.

That included loans of about $500,000 from the city and its Industrial Development Authority and an $800,000 federal grant given several years ago.

Also, the city had backed a $3.2 million Housing and Urban Development loan in 2002, agreeing to make payments if the developers fell through.

That happened last summer, when the city had to make a $158,000 payment before the hotel opened.

In February and April 2008, the project’s general contractor, English Construction, and the bank, Wachovia, filed suit for a combined total of nearly $1 million they had not been paid.

Craddock said then that he was working to settle those debts by increasing the hotel’s occupancy rate, asking Wachovia to sell more of the project’s historic tax credits and applying for state Enterprise Zone tax credits.

The occupancy rate has increased — Craddock said the hotel was at 100 percent occupancy three days this week.

Craddock said he recently heard from a Wachovia official who had an idea for a solution that just needs time, he said.

Resolving the Wachovia debt is essential to the developers’ ability to make the next Housing and Urban Development loan payment in August.

Lynchburg city has set aside $325,000 in Community Development Block Grant money in case the tab falls on the city this summer.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( mombabytiger ) on June 12, 2008 at 4:03 pm

How did the News and Advance get this information?  Why are people trying to vilify this man whose only goal is trying to improve downtown?  He isn’t getting rich doing this and probably never will.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( markluvslabs ) on June 08, 2008 at 9:35 pm

I hope that this hotel succeeds but this is why the City should not have bene involved with this or the many other downtown “wishful thinking” ideas that make no financial sense.  If the City would have taken a bulldozer and started at one end of downtown and worked hard to level and clear much of the area, then we might actually have new hotels and businesses that would build here instead of along Wards Rd and in the counties.  I would give Mr. Craddock the benefit of the doubt in dealing with this particular dispute but the problem is that there are others that keep arising.  Great for Genworth if they helped push the occupancy rate to 100%.  At least they are making the effort to support downtown financially instead of the many who just do so in voice.  Too bad City Council wouldn’t let Genworth do more to renovate downtown when they wanted to expand instead of worrying more about the delapidated buildings rather than the economic interests of downtown.  If this hotel does fail, it will be yet another example of why the City should have spearheaded demolition downtown and prepared it for the 21st Century instead of trying to rebuild every building that existed in the 19th one.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on June 08, 2008 at 12:24 pm

To the moderator of this site I will say that it is puzzling when there seems to be a malfunction and the message says that the submission had errors and was not tranmitted. The entry is gone from the writing area.
You then do another submission, it is accepted and then later both of them show up. Should we just assume that it has been submitted?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on June 08, 2008 at 6:50 am

Can’t you just hear Hal telling these people that the check is in the mail?
So, they charged too much freight so he paid them nothing? This is a ridiculous position for anyone in business to take. Work it out and pay what you owe, that’s the way it works. If not, then the judge will decide.
I think it quite distasteful that Lynchburg’s own big dreamer is such an accomplished whiner and deadbeat.
I also noticed that the hotel has been at 100% for a few days, that’s great, but he didn’t mention that it was because Genworth had booked the entire place at $90.00 per room.
Maybe the city should sue him for charging us too much freight for a load of bull——.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bigjimm ) on June 07, 2008 at 9:28 am

I think an appropriate term to describe Mr. Craddock would have to be ‘obfuscatory’. He uses a lot of smoke and mirrors, but anyone who works in accounts receivable knows that there are lots of shipping and tax issues, but nothing that can’t be worked out among honest parties. Shipping costs are always an issue, but if you want to control shipping costs you have to use your own shipper and a quoted price. If you contract for pre-pay and add then you are at your suppliers mercy and there is nothing to stop them from charging published rates when they actually paid less. It is perfectly legitimate.
I wonder why Mr. Craddock, when bragging about the occupancy rate of 100% didn’t mention that all of the rooms had been contracted by Genworth for $90.00 a night.
I wonder if Hal the Dreamer has ever told anyone, “The check is in the mail.“

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement