Guns in restaurants draw stares but little outcry

Guns in restaurants draw stares but little outcry

Credit: sxc.hu

In Virginia, gun owners are allowed to carry firearms in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, as long as the restaurant permits it and they carry their weapon openly. Legislation to allow concealed weapons in restaurants serving alcohol passed the General Assembly this year, but was vetoed by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine.

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By MATTHEW BARAKAT
Associated Press Writer

Published: May 9, 2008

RESTON, Va. (AP) — The patrons at Champps, an upscale restaurant and bar chain, were eating ribs and drinking beer on a recent Saturday when customer Bruce Jackson stood up and made an announcement: He was armed, and so were dozens of other patrons.

The armed customers stood up in unison, showing off holstered pistols and revolvers. Jackson said a word or two about the rights of gun owners to carry firearms in Virginia, then thanked everyone for their attention and sat down.

And the diners returned to their burgers and Budweisers.

The Virginia Citizens Defense League organized the dinner at Champps to prove a point: that the presence of armed customers in northern Virginia restaurants would elicit little more than shrugs.

The dinner — and several other restaurant visits throughout northern Virginia last month — were a response to comments from the majority leader in the state Senate, Democrat Richard Saslaw, who said during a legislative debate that armed patrons would be unwelcome in northern Virginia restaurants.

“In most urban areas, you walk into a restaurant with a gun on your hip, they’re going to tell you to get out,” Saslaw said.

In fact, with a few exceptions, the gun owners got their meals. The group went to eight different restarants in April — at two of them, they were asked to leave. More often than not, though, their presence failed to generate a stir.

All the restaurants were in Fairfax County, a bastion of suburbia and soccer moms outside Washington that is the wealthiest county in America, according to the most recent Census data. It is also a place where nerves over the gun debate are still somewhat raw a year after the shootings at Virginia Tech, where 32 people were slain, including many from northern Virginia.

The restaurants included numerous family establishments including the Fuddruckers burger chain and the McLean Family Restaurant.

“We wanted to prove not only that (Saslaw) was wrong, but we wanted to make the point that we have the right to self defense. That’s a God-given right,” said Dave Vann, a retired D.C. police officer and VCDL member who organized the restaurant visits.

In Virginia, gun owners are allowed to carry firearms in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, as long as the restaurant permits it and they carry their weapon openly. Legislation to allow concealed weapons in restaurants serving alcohol passed the General Assembly this year, but was vetoed by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine.

While Virginia is generally considered friendly to gun owners, it is only one of two states along with Montana, that requires people to openly carry arms in restaurants that serve alcohol, according to the Web site opencarry.org, which promotes and monitors gun owners’ rights. Eleven states ban guns altogether in restaurants that serve alcohol, while the rest make no distinction between open and concealed carry.

At Champps, several patrons failed to notice that so many customers were armed, even though dozens of gun-toting men and women had walked right past them.

Tomas Nolasco of Reston said he hadn’t noticed the guns and didn’t care as long as they weren’t drinking. (They weren’t.) His wife was a little more concerned.

“There are families in here, children in here,” Cathy Nolasco said. “It bothers me.”

Brendan Fitzgerald of Reston and his friends noticed the guns immediately. They were curious but unconcerned.

“I’m just laughing because it’s totally unnecessary in my opinion,” Fitzgerald said, pointing to one individual who not only was armed but also had several clips of ammunition attached to his belt.

“This is Reston, not Southeast,” said his friend Nathan Dicken, contrasting the northern Virginia suburb to a section of the District of Columbia that has been known for gun violence.

The gun owners say those patrons’ comments miss the point. Vann said the gun owners’ presence make the restaurant more safe, not less. Champps’ manager — Carey Vereen, a gun-rights supporter — agreed.

“This is an area with a large population of government agents — FBI, CIA, local,” Vereen said. “In terms of people seeing open carry, it’s not a shock to our customers.”

Indeed, many of the men who carry weapons say people frequently just assume they’re police or retired police.

For women who carry, it’s a different story. At one restaurant — Mike’s American Grill — the group had gone essentially unnoticed until a woman in her 20s with a satin-finished, stainless-steel revolver got up from her table.

The restaurant’s manager spotted her and asked the group to either put the guns in their cars or leave. They left.

“When I saw the gun on her hip, I was like, ‘What is going on here?”‘ said the manager, Gabba Kaye, who hadn’t noticed the guns when the group of 20 checked in for their lunch reservation.

Kaye said he hadn’t received complaints from customers, but that the weapons made him uncomfortable. He also said he had been warned by the restaurant’s ownership after word got out that VCDL planned a series of restaurant visits. He was specifically instructed not to allow them service while carrying.

The woman who caught the manager’s attention said the gun always attracts notice.

“Every time I go out, I notice people’s eyes going right here,” said the woman, pointing to her hip. She de-clined to give her full name out of privacy concerns. “It’s interesting because it’s not a reaction of fear. It’s more a reaction of ‘You can’t do that. You can’t carry a gun.’ ... It’s like disdain.”

She said she only recently began carrying a gun after a string of sexual assaults in her Alexandria neighborhood.

The second restaurant that turned the group away was Kilroy’s in Springfield — a restaurant where Saslaw was popular enough to once have a sandwich named after him. The owner also said he had been aware of earlier news reports that the VCDL was planning a series of armed lunches.

“We’d just prefer they not come to the restaurant,” said the owner, Phillip “Pip” Thomas. “I’m sure it would offend some customers.”

Saslaw said he’s not necessarily surprised that VCDL found restaurants in the region that would allow them to dine while armed. But he said that carrying guns is simply not normal behavior in this area.

“What normal person walks around with a gun on your hip? Something’s wrong in your life” if you feel compelled to carry a gun as part of your daily routine, he said.

The gun owners bristle at that stereotype. Nearly 100 people attended the various lunches and dinners, including many retired military personnel. Others were white-collar professionals. While most were white men, the group included blacks, Hispanics, Asians and women.

“This isn’t a bunch of drunk rednecks sidling up to a saloon,” said Christopher Wu, 28, of Alexandria, carrying a Springfield XD45 pistol.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 12, 2008 at 10:22 am

(Navywings) informs me…“There is no safe place.“ He also tells me…“I am retired military and have carried a weapon for my entire adult life.“ He asks me…“Do I have a “phobia?”  I WILL NOT ANSWER HIM!  But I will let him answer himself with his own words.  [Here they are folks]...“the small percentage statistical chance we many be the victim (or someone around us) of a violent crime is too great for us”...  CASE CLOSED!  Take out guns, insert.. (plane crashes, snake bites, elevator cable breaks, shark attacks) and what you have is a classic phobic personality.  People who insist upon living their lives based upon what even they know are the exceptions to rules.  I am sure you are a great person (Navywings).  I have NOTHING against you.  But, I would bet you feel naked without your gun.  You would feel uncomfortable I am sure, BUT not as uncomfortable as I feel in a society where any psychopathic wacko can buy a gun.  And, no offence intended, if 20 guys walked into a restaurant and announced to all the people eating lunch.. “Don’t be alarmed, we all have [First Aid Kits] strapped to our chests…. I would think they had problems too.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( modernprophet ) on May 12, 2008 at 9:37 am

We evolved from the weapons maker. Our ancestors probably observed how predators don’t have to graze all day. Find a way to kill something,eat, and you’ve had your protein requirement for the day. Lay around, sun, with the big cats.This inherit trait which guaranteed our existance will eventually lead to our demise. Is beating swords into plowshares a fantasy or a necessity? Carry a gun, die by the gun.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( navywings ) on May 12, 2008 at 9:34 am

Cosmo,

We’re only using the same logic you are. You obviously assume a motivation for someone who carries a weapon as due to a “Rambo” complex or has a need of a binky. You must live in a very idyllic world. We however, live in a realistic world. Those who carry a wepon do so for a number of reasons. I am retired military and have carried a weapon for my entire adult life. Do I have a “phobia?“ Does a law enforcement officer have a phobia? No, we simply are realists when it comes to society.

I hope you never have to experience first hand that there is no “crime-free” area. I don’t care if it’s church, your home, your office or if you’re sitting in a courtroom. There is no safe place.

Now if you CHOOSE to believe you are always safe and play the “big sky, little airplane” mentality in the context of crime, you are free to do so. If, for the remainder of us, the small percentage statistical chance we many be the victim (or someone around us) of a violent crime is too great for us, then it is our prerogative to protect ourselves as we see fit.

Your logic simply is no logic at all. I respect your right not to carry a weapon as you should respect my decision to carry one. My decision has no impact on your life BUT if you were ever the victim of a violent crime and I was nearby and armed, I would step in to assist you. THAT sir, is the difference between you and I and all those like you who have their head in the sand concerning crime. Crime will not go away, but I have never met an anti-gun, anti-carry or whatever you want to call yourself who would refuse help from one of us “phobic, weapon carrying, Rambos” as you affectionately refer.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 12, 2008 at 9:13 am

( japov )?  Why would you assume that people who do not feel the need to carry firearms where ever they go are afraid of guns?  I have owned and shot guns my entire life.  I am not afraid to be armed.  But, unlike you, I am not afraid NOT to be armed, and that is the issue.  Are you claiming that you “know” peoples feelings and what motivates them?  Are you a mind reader then?  The idea that you “think” people who disagree with you are “afraid” of guns gives away your hand.  I am not afraid of guns, snakes, deep water or birds.  But you don’t see me out in a boat with a gun and a snake feeding the birds.  Why?  Because it’s silly.  But not as silly as pretending that you are Rambo or Matt Dillon.  It’s your “Binky” man!  My grandchildren act as you do when anyone suggests that one day they will realize they can live without it.  Then again, some never do.  What do you think Old Sigmund would say about someone who insisted on walking around with his (you know what) in his hand all the time?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( navywings ) on May 12, 2008 at 8:09 am

Cosmo Wafflefoot:

Your logic is so warped it almost doesn’t warrant a response, but let me show you how flawed your logic is. Do you think the students of VT were afraid? They weren’t. They thought they were protected in their academic haven. According to your “logic” that’s why they didn’t or shouldn’t carry a weapon. Only people who are afraid carry guns (we won’t even discuss law enforcement or military).

Being afraid and prepared are two entirely different postures. Someone who carries a first aid kit in their car by your “logic” is someone who is afraid of dying without proper medical attention arriving. How about the logical view they carry it to help someone in need who might have been in an accident? Nah, doesn’t compute by your “logic.“

Go back to your “pop logic” books and come back when you can discuss the topic on some basis other than fire extinguishers.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( japov ) on May 11, 2008 at 6:05 pm

Cosmo Wafflefoot,

As much as you might like to believe those things, they are patently not true, and the loose psychology reference only shows that you have little understanding of either guns or psychology. I can’t think of a single person who owns guns, or carries for personal defense, who has done so out of a feeling of ‘inadequacy’.

As Frued said: “A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity”

He also said: “Just as no one can be forced into belief, so no one can be forced into unbelief”

So I do not expect that I will be changing anyone’s views with this.

With all due respect, I can assure you that no one that takes self defense seriously minds whether or not you think it’s pathetic.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Cosmo Wafflefoot ) on May 11, 2008 at 4:07 pm

Face it!  The only kind of people who “WANT” to walk around armed are people who are afraid.  This is a phobia issue.  The idea that they do this to keep other people safe or to perform some service to society is another part of the phobia.  People with phobias make excuses for their behavior.  They have to!  It is the same with people who are afraid to fly.  NOBODY knows more statistics about aeroplane crashes than people who are afraid to fly.  That is how phobias work.  When a plane goes down they say, “See, See”, but they, as a result of their mental illness can not distinguish the exception from the rule.  Living by the exceptions to rules rather than the rules themselves is a well recognised form of mental illness. It’s the same with these gun people.  They have deep and unresolved fear issues.  Who among us doesn’t know a person who was picked on at school, beaten up and pushed around as a child and then went on to get a job where they could carry a gun and push OTHER people around?  Look at it this way.  If you were sitting in a restaurant and suddenly a man got up and announced that he and his 20 friends were all carrying fire extinguishers…. would you say anything?  Would you object?  Or, would you just say to yourself, “BOY, do they have issues”?  Then again, you probably don’t know how many people are killed by fires that could have been stopped if only people were wise enough to NEVER leave your house without a fire extinguisher!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( crispy daisy ) on May 11, 2008 at 2:04 pm

I’m not going to get into this argument, but I would love to know how Dave Vann came up with the idea that God gave us the right to carry guns. I must have missed that part of the Bible. I guess it could be because guns didn’t exist for hundreds and hundreds of years after Biblical times. Did God tell someone a couple of hundred years ago to add to the Bible: “P.S. Now that someone has invented guns, I grant you the right to carry them wherever you like”?

Carrying guns is not a God-given right; it’s a government-given right, no matter where you stand on the subject of gun control.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( camosoul77 ) on May 11, 2008 at 12:31 pm

Virtually any Psychologist, who isn’t on the take or crazy themselves, can tell you that fear of weapons is the sickness, not the possession of them.  A weapon does nothing without a hand to guide it.

When one fears an object, or is ‘made uncomfortable’ by it, they are really being ‘made uncomfortable’ by the mental conditioning that it, the object, is some how inherently capable of action.  This is irrational.

To then take that irrational fear, and allow it to motivate you into forcing your will upon other, disarming them, shows an unwillingness to cure the actual problem, and promote the same helplessness among others.

To develop insults and implications of mental defct through clearly backwards ‘reasoning’ that defies science and logic, is merely an indicator that these neuroses have been taken to an extreme.

I carry a Weapon.  I am not interested in ‘looking cool.‘  More often than not, I fear the social insults of the ignorant, prejudiced, jerks who cling to their neurosis and hate to such an extent that they will make such comments.

Notice the distinct correlation to how people react and comment on a person carrying a gun, as racists of 60 years ago reacted to a person with black skin.

All they do is spew hate-speech that has no basis in reality.  Talk about how ‘uncomfortable’ they feel, and that they would prefer that ‘people like that’ should go away.

Gun-control/gun-hate is the new racism.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement